--- Dave Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As to my message amounting to an "intrusion for no > good reason," how do > you figure? Was yours less so? Should we just sit > quietly by when you > demean the subjects of our conversations? > > Dave
Recounting the facts from my perspective: Julia mentioned Jim Wallis I wrote a link to an article about him, and gave my assessment of him. You misinterpreted my statement in a way that seemed an attack on me. So I would say that you should sit quietly by if your only contribution is to misinterpret a clear statement on my part in a way that seems meant only to be a poor attempt to make me look as if I'm attacking everyone's favorite list member. Otherwise, feel free to jump in. We all know how opinions that differ from today's orthodoxy are treated here, so why should today be any different? Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Freedom is not free" http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
