On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:53PM, William T Goodall wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me, but it's not a subject I find
important enough to put any extra effort into. If you want to prove
me wrong go ahead and knock yourself out. Otherwise we'll just have
to differ on the matter.
Just to clarify that: since they are quite obviously an active and
dangerous pedophile organisation *now* the only part you could
disprove is that they were in the past also. Since it's a clear
pattern of ongoing behaviour that's documented for the past half
century or so as victims have begun to come forward you'd have to
come up with some reason that pattern *shouldn't* be expected to
continue further back into the past.
Given the Church's ongoing efforts to cover up the issue any lack of
published scandal prior to the well-known present day cases can't
show that molestation wasn't going on then too.
I really don't see how you could disprove it actually, but good luck.
Smoke Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
"if the bible proves the existence of god, then superman comics prove
the existence of superman" - Usenet
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
