Wayne, and anyone else interested in Tour format, 
A couple of reasons not to employ this format immediately spring to
mind.  Firstly this schedule doesn't allow teams any opportunity of
reseeding themselves during the weekend, placing too much importance on
the tournament seeding; and secondly whilst 6 games in a tournament
probably is too much, reducing our playing time to mimic worlds
tournaments misses the crucial element of a worlds tournament being run
over 7 consecutive days whereas we only have 2.  From recent memory 3
games on a Saturday and 2 on a Sunday is pretty much optimum for healthy
competition.
I think the tour format amongst the top 8 of 2003 and prior was ideal in
a lot of ways:  pool-play on Saturday where teams needed to finish in
the top 2 in order to progress, and had the opportunity to reseed
themselves, then semis and final on Sunday.  5 games total.  Maybe
everyone just got bored of this after 6 years, but something with
similar ingredients is what we need.

alex

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Wayne Davey
Sent: 08 September 2004 19:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BD] A Tour proposal

I've got a suggestion to throw into the future of UK ultimate
discussion. It
concerns the A tour and is aimed at reducing the playing load at each
event.
At the moment I feel that 6 long, closish games over a weekend is far
too
many.

I would like each Tour to become a straight 16 team knockout tournament.

The detailed schedule would be something like

Game 1
1 v 16, 2 v 15,..., 8 v9

Game 2
1 v 8,..... 4 v 5;
9 v 16
etc....

(I'm sure you can work out the rest!)

This would make 4 games for each team split into 2 per day. Here are
some of
the reasons why I think this would be a good idea (in no particular
order):

1. We play too many games at Tour events.
I've felt for a long time that 3 hard games in a day is too much.
Overplaying (at the intensity now common at the Tour) is taking risks
with
players' bodies. Injuries (especially wear and tear) must be more likely
when
playing 3 games. I also think it is wrong to play back to back games at
such
a high level. It's too hard mentally and physically

2. It will be more like Worlds/Europeans
At major events there are invariably 1-2 games per day. It would be a
good
thing for the top players to get more used to such a format. We've
already
seen the benefits of getting our players used to a competetive
atmosphere,
we could move things a step closer by moving to 2 games per day

3. All games will count
This increases the competetive edge even more. Group stages (as we have
now)
allow for losses and hence Saturday is not currently as competetive as
Sunday (particularly for seeds 1-4 and 13-16). In a straight knockout,
every
game will affect final positioning and we will get more and more used to
sudden death finishes in games that matter

4. More venues would be available
Clearly fewer games means fewer pitches which means that we could
either:
a- get cheaper tournaments (or better - afford better venues as we would
need less space)
b- have access to better pitches
c- fewer pitches also means fewer (i.e. BETTER!) scoreboards, etc..
I think we would only need 4 pitches (and no back to back games) - or 5
if
we wanted to save 1 for the
final in poor conditions.

5. Easy and understandable scheduling - and a show pitch
One of the bonus things I like is that if we had a show
pitch (with a stand or clubhouse alongside) it's pretty easy to schedule
both days so that there is always a close game on the showpitch, and
most
teams would appear on it over the course of the weekend.

6. Current format is tired
I hold my hands up here as I was there when we discussed and agreed this
year's format.However I get the impression that it was unpopular with
the
top
4 teams as they get many "meaningless" games. The tournament only really
comes alive on the Sunday (by which time a lot of players are
exhausted).

This format relies on accurate seeding. This is now possible for at Tour
events with the occasional exception of Tour 1.

Thanks for getting this far! I just wanted to flag up the idea before we
get
to the UKU conference in case I'm not alone in these views

Wayne


__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://zion.ranulf.net/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp

__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://zion.ranulf.net/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp

Reply via email to