I think the spirit prize is a very important part of our sport.  Especially for 
developing levels, but also at higher levels.  At most tournaments there are a 
handfull of teams that could win the tournament, but most are just there to do 
their best, hopefully improve their rankings, or just to have fun.  So for the 
majority of teams the spirit prize is the more important one, and the one that 
every team in the tournament a) has a chance of winning, and b) should be 
aspiring to win.  Even the majority of top team players surely value spirit, 
even if they covet the tournament trophy more.  I'm thinking of Clapham (may 
have the details wrong here) coming 2nd at Euros 01 but earning an atrocious 
spirit reputation in the process.  4 years later they went back, won the 
tournament, and won spirit.  Maybe I'm wrong, but I assume Clapham made an 
effort to improve their spirit when they went back, and were rather pleased 
that their effort paid off.
 
As to why have a prize instead of just a score, it add's something to the 
prize-giving ceremony at tournament ends.  Everyone knows pretty much where 
everyone ranked, but not for spirit, and the feeling when you've won spirit, or 
a team you voted for wins it, is a great feeling.  It's rewarding that team for 
their effort as much as the trophy for 1st is.  Ok, the scoring system isn't 
perfect, so the team that wins it may not be THE best spirited team at the 
tournament, but they're going to be up there, and I think it's important to 
hold someone up each tournament and celebrate their good spirit, just to remind 
us all that that's what we should be aspiring to.
 
I very much like the recent trend of publishing all spirit scores though.  It 
allows you to see if you did as well as you thought you did, or to see if 
you're one of the ones that really need to work on it.  If you thought you did 
well, and were disappointed not to have won spirit outright, you can see if you 
were close.
 
I used the BULA system at beach worlds last year, and really it only takes a 
minute to do.  All it takes is for captains to gather their teams just after 
the call and discuss it for a minute.  If they forget then the captains can get 
whoever they can find later and go through it.  Which happens often enough with 
any current system too.  It goes a long way to addressing the subjective nature 
of spirit voting, which is one of the bad things about standard rank out of 
ten, or 1st, 2nd, 3rd systems etc.
 
Sometimes one player making a couple of bad calls, or behaving badly in 
general, can ruin a game.  The BULA system doesn't allow for giving such a team 
a low spirit score, but why's that bad?  It would be penalising the whole team 
because of one idiot, and it wouldn't be objective.  It forces you to give more 
thought to the spirit score than just, didn't enjoy that game, that guy was a 
moron, they're getting a low score.  If there is one bad player then he will 
drag their score down a little, so they aren't likely to win, but really 
someone should be talking to that player, not punishing the whole team.
 
I agree with Benji about calling travels.  I should call things more, I usually 
just let them slide.  If they are travelling as blatantly as you described 
though, then it wouldn't be classed within that spirit score category, and 
their own team will be as aware of it as you, so they should talk to the player 
about it.  You should also either talk to him on the sideline, or suggest to 
one of his teammates that they do.
 
Anyway, that's my tuppence worth, apologies for any factual errors, my views no 
one else's etc.
Graham
 
_________________________________________________________________
Find the best and worst places on the planet
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719807/direct/01/
__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fysh.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/staying-informed

Reply via email to