On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:00:39 -0500, Mikel King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >(aside to Mikel: your formatting and gmail don't play nicely together...) > This is weird cause I've selected plain text (not even both) for the > formatting and now this is the second time someone is mentioning, this.
This last time worked; not sure about what happened before... > >Why "cheapen" a cert by having something that is basically wallpaper? > >Is there an MS "user" cert? (I don't know.) > >Ask yourself: what is this *for*? What do I want to *certify*? Who would > >care? > True but to be a standard windows user you don't need to know any cli. Nowadays, you can be a standard NetBSD user and not spend much time inside a CLI. > As I said it's a nice to have certainly not a requirement. I'm not sure it's even "nice to have" -- it sorta cheapens the whole thing. > >I'm just tossing out a criticism of it, and making an alternative > >suggestion: no additional certs can be piled on a junior BSD cert. > We are talking about core competencies here. Neither the Jr nor Sr admin > would be a CCIE level on it's own. But with the appropriate addons they > could be I guess. I mean differences between the two could probably be > things like kernel patching and compiling, disk geometry and things like > that... Right...but to me, first you get to be a whizbang level 3, and *then* you get to be a whizbang level 3 with oak clusters... > Mikel King //jbaltz -- jerry b. altzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo mane padme hum _______________________________________________ BSDcert mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsdcert
