Is it possible to ask Kees to redo the job or tell us how to redo it ? MaX.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13/05/2008 09:24:18: > Yes that is the point. The IsCloseCube function was seriously damaged. > Amongst others it counted every too good to double as a close cube > decision, regardless of how close it actually was. > > Christian. > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Michael Petch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > sysware.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 5/12/08 4:41 PM, "Christian Anthon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This doesn't work any more. The cube error rate was broken and had to > > > be fixed, which invalidates the formulas. New ones could be made if > > > somebody care. I don't. > > > > > > > This is an unusual development. I'm going to sound a bit foolish. When you > > say the cube error rate was broken - do you mean that since the time Kees > > created the formula, GnuBG's Cube error rate calculation changed > > significantly enough where by the Luck Adjusted Values (And the associated > > Fibs Rating Difference) currently showing in a match analysis are not > > correct and shouldn't even be displayed? > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > Bug-gnubg@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
