On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:41:35 GMT, Ludovic Henry <luhe...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the source >> tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different >> architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target) >> from the same jdk source tree. >> >> The simplest solution is to build binutils out-of-tree and into the >> build/<target>/binutils folder. These out-of-tree builds are already >> supported by binutils and only require some changes in the way we invoke the >> binutils/configure command. > > Ludovic Henry has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Remove unrelated change > - Merge branch 'master' of github.com:openjdk/jdk into > dev/ludovic/upstream-hsdis-cross-compile > - 8295262: Build binutils out of source tree > > Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the > source tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different > architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target) > from the same jdk source tree. > > The simplest solution is to build binutils out-of-tree and into the > build/<target>/binutils folder. These out-of-tree builds are already > supported by binutils and only require some changes in the way we invoke the > binutils/configure command. I think we want to ask @magicus about this as well, maybe he will discover some unusual quirks in this code. Otherwise, I'll sponsor. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10689
