On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:11:34 GMT, Andrew Dinn <ad...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> You can probably remove the entire function given it's an indirection to >> `das` anyway. I remember using it for debugging during the first stages of >> the Windows-AArch64 port but I've long forgotten about it. > > @luhenry @magicus das1 was added when we were implementing the AArch64 port > in order to help us integrate the debugger support we provided when running > JITted code on our AArch64 simulator into gdb. Now that we have real hardware > it is redundant. Thanks @adinn for the confirmation! I've now removed it. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17967#discussion_r1505045060
