On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:41:04 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> cc @karianna @gdams, is there a Windows/AArch64 owner? >> >>> Or maybe it's time to retire the Windows/aarch64 port >> >> I guess Windows/AArch64 as a platform hasn't really taken off _yet_, give it >> a few more years 😉 I certainly would not advocate for removing it. > > Instead of discussing removal of windows/aarch64 (although the general rule > in OpenJDK is that ports that are not maintained by anyone should be > removed); let's stick to the question here: do we need to export `das1()` for > debugging? Personally I have never used `das`/`das1` on any AArch64 port when debugging. I guess it was somewhat handy when the backend was originally developed. I would argue that the built-in disassembler of any debugger and `disnm` from `debug.cpp` are good enough, and thus `das`/`das1` can be removed. What do you think @theRealAph ? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17967#discussion_r1500568587
