On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:03:37 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster <bur...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> Instead of discussing removal of windows/aarch64 (although the general rule 
>> in OpenJDK is that ports that are not maintained by anyone should be 
>> removed); let's stick to the question here: do we need to export `das1()` 
>> for debugging?
>
> Personally I have never used `das`/`das1` on any AArch64 port when debugging. 
>  I guess it was somewhat handy when the backend was originally developed.  I 
> would argue that the built-in disassembler of any debugger and `disnm` from 
> `debug.cpp` are good enough, and thus `das`/`das1` can be removed.  What do 
> you think @theRealAph ?

Removal makes sense - thank you @lewurm, @luhenry, and @adinn for your input!

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17967#discussion_r1505070224

Reply via email to