On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:29:26 walter harms wrote: > > I liked simple. > > i do not understand. we all like the "simple" stuff else we would write > bloaty-clicky-bunty stuff that needs 3GHz just to start. > > Sometimes people post ideas that do not fit exactly into busysbox (like > this libm stuff). It is a valid idea. it is a good idea.
Ah, I misunderstood. I thought the proposal was to copy libm functions into libbb so busybox wouldn't need as much out of libc, which struck me as a road to reimplementing the whole of libc in busybox. Rob _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
