In spite of what Loic said, I would like to add an outside view, having only followed this thread passively: I believe this is a good suggestion, notwithstanding the fact that somebody might like the idea of actually using libm functionality, but keeping the included code as small as possible. I cannot judge the patch's quality, so I can only opt for your suggestion, Denys. The patch thing, though - not my call.
-- Alexander Kriegisch Certified Scrum Master + Practitioner http://scrum-master.de Denys wrote: > Will it satisfy you Loïc if we will rename CONFIG_FEATURE_AWK_MATH > to CONFIG_FEATURE_AWK_LIBM (or ..._MATH_LIB, taking into account > newbie user's needs) to indicate more clearly that this option > will pull in libm, and add CONFIG_FEATURE_DC_LIBM too? > > Whoever doesn't want to link against libm is very likely > to not require these awk/dc features, so [s]he will > just unselect these two options. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
