2008/10/21 Denys Vlasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 20 October 2008 10:56:22 am Loïc Grenié wrote: > It's more like I did not fully understand your use case. > You want to be able to not bloat busybox > with standard libm (indeed, ~9k on 32bit x86).
My use case is with gnu libm which is much larger > You proposed some replacement, "small libm". I read that people > found it not precise enough (I did not test it). Indeed. > I found out that there is other method to not bloat busybox - > just switch off parts which require libm. That's fine. > What I do not know, and therefore ask you, is this an acceptable > solution for this use case? Is your use case require pow and exp > functions in awk and dc? Not changing anything is perfectly fine with me. I will statically link libm and that's ok for me. Thanks, Loïc _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox