Hi Laszlo ! >That is the fourth solution I see now in a raw... after Yocto, >Buildroot and OpenWrt... > >This is what I was referring to. It is inconsistent across >projects. :) > >That being said, it seems that Harald is objecting to this >heavily for some reason (may be miscommunication between us).
I told you, it's not wrong to find a common solution, but changing Busybox binary for this seams to be the wrong place. Find a way to provide a script that may be used by all those projects. Not every modification needs to affect the main BB binary. As a kind of miscommunication it looks to me you do not really know how much code it requires to let a daemon reread it's config when things change ... and config file support without rereading makes no sense, as you can set all parameters on the command line and script may acquire the configured options in so many comfortable ways (not increasing BB binary size). -- Harald _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox