Hello David, I have made fixes to the patch from 2015-03-21, according to your comments.
Please take a look. Thank you! On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:12 AM, David Drysdale <drysd...@google.com> wrote: > The first version of the patch still has the problem that it changes the > size of > an existing structure and thus alters the ABI. Personally, I prefer the > patch > you sent 2015-03-21, just without the age+reserved fields (and with the > other > tweaks I suggested 2016-01-28). > > D. > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Fedor Indutny <fe...@indutny.com> wrote: > >> No worries at all! >> >> Does the first version of patch look better now? >> >> Thank you, >> Fedor. >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Fedor Indutny wrote: >>> >>> Just FYI, this `age` thing was actually suggested by you earlier in this >>>> thread, but I will be more than happy to remove it. >>>> >>> >>> I know, and I'm sorry I lead you down that path! :-( >>> >>> -- >>> >>> / daniel.haxx.se >>> >> >> >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJWr8EeAAoJENcGPM4Zt+iQb4MP/R/pRn3cSTnckfuUGDPhSXiW 36B6mUOnz7WaKLTucEYsvU9CtrLsBnAMu61QyfzDIvYkswAKaFzBEcZlqf0Vq9ir Niw07sRUelJRcnlU2yAQ75INSgCXVoVlhvGGF9UT0cKZf4UeLkXFS0oDmvtwDDDS aEXKkLOAveknAXn0zxUy+Xv4iJgtkU+I4hR2CJu2iriNRFEZNMBh55R9gSRD8iqM cMfR5UH0GkySiHVlTMX66CX18PjysObDVYaNYr3XnSe4UByHj18w3OCQtnahOCDd RMx95YF/sQu9l6GQ6HuHTyMGh0FbYYBApy/s7AHAkbK6DqWPwLvSfm2TF75p7rE1 G8fH79/ye57W59bUmB3HWY1mnsIj/9/Z5/m7vo83CuSnWB34m2okIVAIRYRS4dTz TLvMS4ELTJiJyTGJJX/xLYD1KQzEPHO1XYmiCDeNSzWM5yNMTO/u71uQsCsW37Ie o9rT35lXncS4ynmCTdkZwACciVc/KlgaAQBRZrnBeBnORwauo14UWr1rOxf9U+ch 6Q6ZoBlEx3Etjug++0gVc9gkUiJqon4Eb7h+3CK5hGSmkOY+m4ez+Yy2VLayjnNH ZhKsgwKQz3CSZCLKQrDBOn3jWoroJaJKGpift/Z9Hal58jaZdEQZ+vtmR99cBVtG WqFeWnriXTE9wbo4B35r =HqUy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
0001-txt-introduce-ares_parse_txt_reply_ex.patch
Description: Binary data
