On 12月17日, 下午11時30分, "John David Anderson (_psychic_)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 16, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Action wrote: > > The problem with ZF is its advertised strength: "Hey look everyone at > our kewl components." In my view ZF is not a framework, it's a subset > of PEAR for web developers. There's no over-arching sense of where to > put things. There aren't conventions and best practices. It is no more > of a framework than PEAR is. > > To me, ZF is the pieces you use to build a website, not the framework > and guide that CakePHP is. > > -- John
I think ZF is one flexible framework which you could use it in Cake style or in PEAR style. I would love to hear core developers intend to include some resources from ZF(like the java part, because I still couldn't find better solutions to generate reports without problems in Chinese.) and ezComponents (like the work-flow engine). :) --- kiang --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
