I mean that there is a hell lot of people learning jQuery, not JavaScript these days. Every allegedly javascript developer should, at least, read the ECMA-262. Gabriel Gilini
www.usosim.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:08 PM, 703designs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean by that. jQuery is written in JavaScript > (not like MochiKit, which tries to make JavaScript look like Python). > > On Oct 31, 2:43 pm, "Gabriel Gilini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The right answers is: learn real javascript > > Yes, the learning curve with jQuery is way lower, but when you really > know > > javascript, take a look in proto ;) > > > > Gabriel Gilini > > > > www.usosim.com.br > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Samuel DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Here's my take for what little it's worth (note I use scripa/proto) > > > if you want to use the ajax helper at this point you are tied to > > > scripta/proto. now given that the stated plans in unofficial channels > > > is that the helper is either being migrated to jQuery or being driving > > > to a javascript _framwork_ agnostic place, it really doesn't matter. > > > > > If on the otherhand you see yourself not feeling like the helper as it > > > exists now will meet your needs and you will be wanting insight and > > > help from people on this list on integrating javascript _framework_ > > > into your project, then I would say that the responses to your > > > question indicate, to me, that jQuery is a more of the current > > > 'hotness' and you are likely to get more help from people jazzed up on > > > jQuery. > > > > > To me it is a question of who is going to help you if you need it and > > > what do you think your projected needs are. > > > > > See totally unhelpful answer ;) > > > > > Sam D > > > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Gabriel Gilini < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > Sorry, mate, but prototype also supports all CSS3 selectors. > > > > > > ps: I never use cakephp's ajax helpers, and I love writing javascript > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Gabriel Gilini > > > > > >www.usosim.com.br > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Josey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > >> I perfer jQuery as well. > > > >> Many Bakers like prototype due to the javascript and ajax helpers > that > > > >> come with CakePHP. > > > >> These make baking with JS quite a bit easier, not to mention faster > > > >> however many Javascript experts would cringe to think that > developers > > > >> are using php helpers for the behavioral portion of their sites > > > >> because the scripts are no longer unobtrusive. > > > > > >> jQuery is very easy to learn and uses many of the same selectors > that > > > >> CSS 2 and 3 use making it incredibly easy to develop around. > > > >> However, if you require a JS helper there is a jQuery helper for > > > >> CakePHP called pQuery. > > > >>http://www.ngcoders.com/php/pquery-php-and-jquery > > > > > >> If not then spend some time at the jQuery API and read through the > > > >> tutorials. > > > >>http://docs.jquery.com/Main_Page > > > > > >> I love jQuery. > > > > > >> On Oct 30, 5:49 pm, Matthieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > Hello, > > > > > >> > I'm gonna create a web app using CakePHP but I'm confused about > > > >> > chosing between Jquery or Scriptalious? Which one should I choose? > > > >> > Does it really matter? What's the differences between them? > > > > > >> > tks > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
