> Please. You're not talking about the same thing. Ben talks about the > benefits such a vm would have once it would be done, you talk about how hard > it would be to do it.
Exactly, thanks. I assume it's save to say that most today (business) critical applications have to be written in a vm supported language. What is with Ocamls vm then? I have the impression that only little development is going into Ocamls vm. Or is that wrong? If no - what is the reason for this? What if ocamlopt would be dropped for a faster ocaml vm? Would that be an option? _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
