--- Sean Gilbertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Capitalism is defined as "an economic system based
> on private ownership of capital," so capitalism
> itself as defined that way bears no requirement of
> employee hierarchy.
Makes sense to me.
Now, if you are a single mother working at Starbucks
in New York making $5.25 an hour and you expenses are
$5.26 an hour how do you acquire private ownership of
capital?
If Starbucks offshores their entire IT department to
India and saves millions will the single mother then
be able to acquire private ownership of capital?
In fact in the most basic
> sense, the employees do own the company.
Explain that to the single mother working at Starbucks
in New York making $5.25 an hour.
Stede
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
