Julian wrote: > Sorry Roger Adrian is right here. > However the canals have to be got back to their original profile that > will cost more, but once they are there then there is no more cost > keeping them there than keeping them at any other arbitrary level.
Well bless my soul. So how do they get them back to the wide-beam (correct) profile then? Magic them? So my point is made, it will cost more to 'restore' and maintain at wide beam standards. QED. I rest my case. It was the restoration aspect at present funding levels that I knew wasn't going to happen, not maintenance 'after' some mythical, magical, transformation of the system by persons unknown. Roger
