--- In [email protected], Martin Clark <ya...@...> wrote: >
> > > > Just a quickie for now. > > I did check your site - so where you have answered No the answer should > > have read Yes. > > > > If we click on your signature url blah co uk. > > there is no apparent mention of the Hudd demise. > > First item on the page: "Leak Shuts Huddersfield Canal". > > Have you tried clicking "refresh"? oh no ! > > > If we click from there to the Rochdale header - then hey presto - your > > hidden report of the hudd apppears ! > > > > If you were to publish pw as blahcouk/indexhtml - me and others would come > > acrossthe Hudd demise hassel free. > > Try it and see - you will get "The system cannot find the file > specified." or something similar. I do not use .html file names. > > There was nothing wrong with the link in my signature. Just that your > browser was seeing an older version of the home page. Like I say, if you > click "refresh" you will see the latest version. Please try all options > before making unjustified criticisms. > > Now, have you a comment about the leak? > -- oops-- sorry, grovel -- no Not here anyway! pete-(back under stone)
