On 1 Jul 2010, at 10:33, Steve wrote: > And then we could have 24 hour reality shows, intermingled with 2nd rate news > services. The TV license does what it says on the box..it ensures an high > quality, unbiased (as much as possible) public service broadcaster available > to all.
Quite right - and don't forget the pointless adverts taking up 20-25% of the viewing time. If I hear that pathetic bloke singing about LG phones one more time I think I'll throw something through the screen.... > > IMHO > > Steve > > --- In [email protected], Adrian Stott <re...@...> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:49:42 +0100, "Mack, David" >> <david.m...@...> wrote: >> >>> I am required to have a licence for my TV. Where I live there is no >>> Channel 5 or Freeview reception. Do you think the TV licensing people >>> will give me a discount? >> >> No, I think the TV licence should be scrapped, and the BBC funded by >> subscriptions (or, much better, privatised). >> >> Adrian >> >> Adrian Stott >> Tel. UK (0)7956-299966 >> -- Andy Greener n.b. Whisper Pangbourne, UK http://www.nb-whisper.com "With Windows, failure is not an option - it's built-in"
