On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:32 AM, William G. Thompson, Jr. <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Team,
>>
>> Unicon has already implemented MFA in CAS for a few clients and we
>> were just awarded a contract to build a modular extension to the CAS
>> Server to support multi-factor, and levels of assurance along the
>> lines of the vision articulated in
>> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/CAS/Level+Of+Assurance+-+Head+document
>>
>> This project requires that the resulting CAS server customizations be
>> released as free and open source software for adoption with and in CAS
>> (i.e. as cas-addons or the Jasig distribution).  We intend to engage
>> with the community throughout the implementation.
>>
>> This project provides a real world deployment scenario to build upon
>> the authN API work that Marvin has completed thus far.  So I think
>> this is good news for CAS 4.1/5.0 in that we can be assured that the
>> work to date on authN API, MFA, and LOA will yield deployable code
>> even though it didn't ship with 4.0.
>>
>> In terms of "big features" for 4.0, I think we've made substantial
>> progress along a number of paths that lead to a more supple,
>> extensible and elegant CAS server that is a joy to install, configure
>> and run[1].
>>
>> * Externalizing SAML as an optional support
>> * Upgrades to all dependancies
>> * OAuth support improvements
>> * Externalized Services Management Webapp
>> * A bunch of security related improvements including encrypting
>> clearpass cache by default
>> * Many other improvements.
>
>
> I don't see anything here that merits a major release. What's the problem
> with pushing the release date so the authN API features can be included in
> 4.0?

Hi Dan,

The current dev cycle started last summer and we've already pushed the
release date several months.  In that time, additional scope has
continually been added.  At some point in time the project has to trim
scope and cut a release.

I'm sure there would be no objection to sliding the date a few days or
even a week or so.

Best,
Bill


>
> --Daniel Fisher
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to