Hi Wes & Rurik,

Thanks! I updated the repository and can compile designs successfully now.

Thanks again,

Nimish


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Wesley New <wes...@ska.ac.za> wrote:

> Hi Nimish,
>
> The mkbok_64 has been rebuilt with the -static option so that it now
> includes the required libraries in the executable, I committed it last
> friday. You can pull the latest libraries from SKA-SA. If this still doesnt
> work then you can build mkbof from the mkbof repository, also on the ska-sa
> github page.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Wes
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Nimish Sane <nimishs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Wes and Rurik!
>>
>> Wes, get_xlVersion() returns 11.4. I had to modify a switch case in
>> 'casper_xps.m' to get rid of an error dialog box.
>>
>> Rurik's suggestion helped me get rid of the following errors:
>>
>> *XPS% Loading xmp file system.xmp*
>> *ERROR:EDK - This project was created with EDK version 14.2, but the
>> installed
>>    version of EDK tools is 11.4
>> ERROR:EDK - while running revup
>>
>> XPS% Evaluating file run_xps.tcl
>> ERROR:EDK - Load a MHS or XMP file first
>> cp: cannot stat `implementation/system.bit': No such file or directory*
>>
>> I am able to successfully get to bitgen step. However, the compilation
>> fails with the following error:
>>
>> *./mkbof_64: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required
>> by ./mkbof_64)
>> chmod: cannot access `implementation/system.bof': No such file or
>> directory
>> cp: cannot stat `implementation/system.bof': No such file or directory
>>
>> Error using ==> gen_xps_files at 655
>> Programation files generation failed, EDK compilation probably also
>> failed.
>> *
>> *
>> *
>> I am using Centos 5.8 with glibc 2.5 and this was fine so far until I
>> upgraded to the latest libraries. Do I need to have glibc2.7? It seems the
>> only way I can do it is by upgrading to Centos 6. Is there any way around
>> it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nimish
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Rurik A. Primiani <
>> rprim...@cfa.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nimish,
>>>
>>> I am currently running the latest ska-sa libraries with Xilinx 11.5 and
>>> Matlab R2009b. I also came across a version error at first but was able to
>>> fix it by changing the version numbers of the following file from 14.2 to
>>> 11.5:
>>>
>>> ./mlib_devel/xps_base/XPS_**ROACH2_base/system.xmp.sx476t
>>>
>>> This is the project file used to run XPS. I think making this change
>>> won't break the toolflow with 14.2 because of backwards compatibility but I
>>> have not confirmed this.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Rurik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/8/12 11:59 AM, Nimish Sane wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Wes,
>>>>
>>>> I was able to use the ska-sa mlib_devel repository with Xilinx 11.4 and
>>>> Matlab 2009b earlier, and successfully compile my designs. With the
>>>> latest update, it seems I can no longer use these versions. The
>>>> compilation fails with an error that I have Xilinx 11.4 installed, which
>>>> is not supported. Is it now mandatory to upgrade to Xilinx14.2 and
>>>> Matlab 2012a?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Nimish
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Nimish Sane <nimishs...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:nimishs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>>     That worked. After updating the libraries xsg core config was set to
>>>>     default Roach.
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>     Nimish
>>>>
>>>>     On Oct 5, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Mark Wagner <mwag...@ssl.berkeley.edu
>>>>     <mailto:mwagner@ssl.berkeley.**edu <mwag...@ssl.berkeley.edu>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      It's in both, you'll need to specify ROACH2 in the xsg_core_config
>>>>>     block though.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Mark
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Nimish Sane <nimishs...@gmail.com
>>>>>     <mailto:nimishs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>>         This is bwrc repo or ska-sa? I am using ska-sa and could not
>>>>>         find it.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>         Nimish
>>>>>
>>>>>         On Oct 5, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Mark Wagner
>>>>>         <mwag...@ssl.berkeley.edu 
>>>>> <mailto:mwagner@ssl.berkeley.**edu<mwag...@ssl.berkeley.edu>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          Hi Nimish,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         If you pull the new 10gbe_v2 yellowblock from the most recent
>>>>>>         repo, all of those options should be available - sfp+,
>>>>>>         roach2, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Nimish Sane
>>>>>>         <nimishs...@gmail.com <mailto:nimishs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Hi Wes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             I just updated to the latest libraries. Great work! I am
>>>>>>             looking forward to using those. I have a quick question.
>>>>>>             Does ten_Gbe_v2 block support Roach2? The "port"
>>>>>>             parameter on the yellow block can be set to between 0 and
>>>>>>             3. I understand that Roach 2 will have 6 CX4 ports (3
>>>>>>             each per mezzanine card). How does that map to the yellow
>>>>>>             block?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Also, I remember from the casper workshop that there was
>>>>>>             going to be a setting to select between CX4 and SFP+
>>>>>>             connection. Do you know what's the status with that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Nimish
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Andrew Martens
>>>>>>             <and...@ska.ac.za <mailto:and...@ska.ac.za>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Hi Dave, Wes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 We could probably write a little Wishbone-to-OPB
>>>>>>                 module and plug that in
>>>>>>                 front of the OPB yellow blocks for some things.
>>>>>>                 Messing with the
>>>>>>                 internals of yellow blocks that we don't have
>>>>>>                 hardware for could be
>>>>>>                 dangerous e.g ADCs. Ideally people would help out
>>>>>>                 with yellow blocks
>>>>>>                 they have hardware for and have expertise in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Regards
>>>>>>                 Andrew
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 13:29 +0200, Wesley New wrote:
>>>>>>                 > Hi Dave,
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 > Unfortunately the move to wishbone will need to be
>>>>>>                 done en mass.
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 > Wes
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:40 PM, David MacMahon
>>>>>>                 > <dav...@astro.berkeley.edu
>>>>>>                 
>>>>>> <mailto:davidm@astro.berkeley.**edu<dav...@astro.berkeley.edu>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>                 >         Hi, Wes,
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >         Are you converting all yellow blocks to
>>>>>>                 wishbone en masse or
>>>>>>                 >         can they be converted one by one over time?
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >         Thanks,
>>>>>>                 >         Dave
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >         On Sep 27, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Wesley New
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 > > Hi Rurik
>>>>>>                 > >
>>>>>>                 > > These updates don't contain the wishbone port,
>>>>>>                 that is the
>>>>>>                 >         next item
>>>>>>                 > > on my to-do list.
>>>>>>                 > >
>>>>>>                 > > Wes
>>>>>>                 > >
>>>>>>                 > > On 9/27/12, Rurik A. Primiani
>>>>>>                 <rprim...@cfa.harvard.edu
>>>>>>                 
>>>>>> <mailto:rprimian@cfa.harvard.**edu<rprim...@cfa.harvard.edu>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 >         wrote:
>>>>>>                 > >> Hi Wes,
>>>>>>                 > >>
>>>>>>                 > >> Great work! I look forward to using the newer
>>>>>>                 tools. Just a
>>>>>>                 >         quick
>>>>>>                 > >> question, does this update include the migration
>>>>>>                 to the
>>>>>>                 >         Wishbone bus
>>>>>>                 > >> discussed at the workshop?
>>>>>>                 > >>
>>>>>>                 > >> Best,
>>>>>>                 > >> Rurik
>>>>>>                 > >>
>>>>>>                 > >> On 9/26/12 9:01 AM, Wesley New wrote:
>>>>>>                 > >>> Good Day all,
>>>>>>                 > >>>
>>>>>>                 > >>> We have updated the existing MSSGE toolflow to
>>>>>>                 work with
>>>>>>                 >         the Xilinx 14.2
>>>>>>                 > >>> tools and Matlab2012a. I have provided a
>>>>>>                 wikipage with all
>>>>>>                 >         the details
>>>>>>                 > >>> and how to get an environment setup, available
>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>                 > >>>
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 https://casper.berkeley.edu/**
>>>>>> wiki/MSSGE_Setup_with_Xilinx_**14.2_and_Matlab_2012a<https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/MSSGE_Setup_with_Xilinx_14.2_and_Matlab_2012a>
>>>>>>                 > >>>
>>>>>>                 > >>>
>>>>>>                 > >>> The ska-sa mlib_devel repository currently
>>>>>>                 hosts these
>>>>>>                 >         changes and can
>>>>>>                 > >>> be found at:
>>>>>>                 
>>>>>> https://github.com/ska-sa/**mlib_devel<https://github.com/ska-sa/mlib_devel>.
>>>>>> So feel
>>>>>>                 >         free to start
>>>>>>                 > >>> using the latest tools and post any
>>>>>>                 issues/feeback to the
>>>>>>                 >         mailing list.
>>>>>>                 > >>>
>>>>>>                 > >>> Thanks
>>>>>>                 > >>>
>>>>>>                 > >>> Wesley
>>>>>>                 > >>
>>>>>>                 > >
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to