TF,

 

It's probably more about rig geometry requiring the placement than the type
of traveler in the first place. 

 

Wing Tip, has a shorter boom than a C27 and is very happy with mid boom
sheeting. Our local summer wind pattern is feast or famine so you have to be
happy with a hand full of knots or 25+ with the rare transitional speed day
thrown in for good measure. I went for a rigid vang to handle the boom
weight for light air. Since she is also a full batten main I rarely twist
her open at the top but deal via the Dutchman and double reefs.

 

Phil Agur
<http://www.catalina27.org/public_pages/profile270.htm> s/v Wing Tip
Secretary,                    Call Sign WCW3485
IC27/270A                   MMSI 366901790 
 <http://www.catalina27.org> www.catalina27.org     Vessel Doc# 1039809

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tim ford
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: catalina27-talk: Traveler upgrade

 

Totally agree with Art.

Look at any big boat program in the last 5-10 years and you'll see where 

the trav has ended up.

 

Are people ordering purpose-built, million dollar custom one-offs with 

the travs well aft b/c it looks nice? Nope, it's

b/c this location offers the best sail shape control and a cleaner, more 

ergonomically efficient cockpit.

 

go aft, young man.

 

tf

see attached image

 

 

HERRICK wrote:

> John,

>  

> 5 years ago, I replaced the original coachroof traveler with the 

> Garhauer traveler that you purchased. It was definitely superior, and 

> actually let you move the car around under a load. However, the aft 

> traveler I installed is far superior for ease of trimming and sail 

> shape control. The coachroof traveler is so far forward that if you 

> sheet down hard, the mainsheet acts as a powerful downhaul and 

> stretches the halyard. This is not what you want.

>  

> Regards,

> Art Herrick

> #5468

> */Sea Change/*

 

Reply via email to