* Andy Grundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-07 15:30]: > On Apr 7, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: >> You mean, a webserver for running Catalyst apps? ’Cause in the >> general case, a single-process, select-based server will yield >> higher performance. > > In order to do that properly, the parent process would have to > proxy all data through to backend processes. That's the model > I tried for the (unreleased) Sprocket engine, but I wasn't > really happy with it.
Yeah – as I said, it’s faster when comparing all possible approaches. But the app must be designed around that model. Catalyst isn’t. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/