Hi
 
What is the solution and which routers do I need to change the area ID and how 
do I do it?
 
Kind Regards
Ahmed

--- Den tis 2009-09-01 skrev prakash patel <[email protected]>:


Från: prakash patel <[email protected]>
Ämne: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 
150.100.12.2, FastEt
Till: [email protected], [email protected]
Datum: tisdag 1 september 2009 20.20




#yiv1806282282 .hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;padding:0px;}
#yiv1806282282 {
font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}

 mismatch area ID,
 


Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:20:12 +0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 
150.100.12.2, FastEt






 
I have started OSPF process ID 123 and put Area 0 on a frame-relay, using R2 is 
the hub, R5 and R6 are the spokes. I am using subnet 150.100.100.0/24 on the 
Frame-relay.
 
I have also started OSPF 123 between R2s Fa0/0 and R1s Fa0/0 putting then in 
Area 0.
 
I do have neigbors and I can see the remote routes in each routing table. But 
the issue is that I am getting the ERROR message below in the blue line when I 
start OSPF 123 on the 150.100.221.0/24 subnet putting it into area 678
 
150.100.221.0/24  is directly connected to R7s fa0/0
 
R6(config-router)#network 150.100.221.0 0.0.0.255 area 678
R6(config-router)#
*Sep  1 19:15:38.911: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: mismatch area ID,
 from backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 150.100.12.2, FastEt
hernet0/1
 
Please help me out.
 
Kind Regards
Ahmed


Låna pengar utan säkerhet.
Sök och jämför lån hos Kelkoo.


With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. Click here. 


      __________________________________________________________
Låna pengar utan säkerhet. Jämför vilkor online hos Kelkoo.
http://www.kelkoo.se/c-100390123-lan-utan-sakerhet.html?partnerId=96915014
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to