Hi Matt,
here R9 interfaces configuration, it's consistent with what I have on R6:
R9#sh run int s0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 138 bytes
!
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
clock rate 2000000
ppp reliable-link
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
end
R9#sh run int s0/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 138 bytes
!
interface Serial0/2
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
clock rate 2000000
ppp reliable-link
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
end
R9#sh run int mul1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 147 bytes
!
interface Multilink1
ip address 110.99.96.5 255.255.255.252
ppp multilink
ppp multilink links minimum 2 mandatory
ppp multilink group 1
end
Patrice Ngassam
CEO NEN NET Inc.
From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:39:30 +1000
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Issue with connected route
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Can we see the interface configs?No peer neighbor route or something like that?
If you use hdlc on each link instead of ppp can you ping then?
Cheers,Matt
Sent from my iPad
On 11/06/2010, at 16:29, Patrice Ngassam <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi there,
I tried Volume 2 - Lab3 using GNS3 and I am getting weird output. I configured
MLPPP between R6 and R9 but they could not ping each other:
R6>sh ip int br
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/0 110.99.46.6 YES NVRAM up up
FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/2 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/3 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
Multilink1 110.99.96.6 YES NVRAM up up
R6>ping 110.99.96.5
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 110.99.96.5, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
R6>sh ip route 110.99.96.6
% Subnet not in table
R6>sh ip route 110.99.46.6
Routing entry for 110.99.46.0/27
Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* directly connected, via Serial0/0
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
R6>
Same output on R9:
R9>sh ip int br
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up down
FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/2 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/3 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
Multilink1 110.99.96.5 YES NVRAM up up
R9>ping 110.99.96.6
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 110.99.96.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
R9>sh ip route 110.99.96.5
% Network not in table
R9>
I could not find what's wrong !
Patrice Ngassam
CEO NEN NET Inc.
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:37:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Do I put my wic-1&2t's in slot 0 or slot 1?
I used slot 1 and 2 to enable the configs to work better.
This allows for faster pasting of configs. This is the
area that seems to slow down the most...prepping my lab for the study module.
De nouvelles Emoticones sur Messenger ? Téléchargez les Emoticones pâte à
modeler !
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
_________________________________________________________________
Installez gratuitement les nouvelles Emoch'ticones !
http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/emoticones/telecharger-emoticones-emochticones.aspx_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
