Btw. If you think reading RFC 1149 is fun, search for a reference implementation...
Hint: Bergen Linux User Group 2001 :-) -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. :: On Jan 27, 2011, at 22:17, Max Pierson <[email protected]> wrote: > I actually stumbled across that exact link after I reading 1149/2549. Had no > idea IETF actually published RFC's like those. > > The 12 days of tech Christmas was great. Needless to say, much of the early > afternoon was wasted reading RFC's. > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are PLENTY of good ones out there ;) >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day_RFC >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Max Pierson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I never thought reading a RFC could be so .... well funny lol >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Aahhahahah!!!!!! >>>> >>>> That's awesome Marko :) >>>> >>>> The RFC Frame Format for those who aren't familiar! >>>> >>>> Frame Format >>>> >>>> The IP datagram is printed, on a small scroll of paper, in >>>> hexadecimal, with each octet separated by whitestuff and blackstuff. >>>> The scroll of paper is wrapped around one leg of the avian carrier. >>>> A band of duct tape is used to secure the datagram's edges. The >>>> bandwidth is limited to the leg length. The MTU is variable, and >>>> paradoxically, generally increases with increased carrier age. A >>>> typical MTU is 256 milligrams. Some datagram padding may be needed. >>>> >>>> Upon receipt, the duct tape is removed and the paper copy of the >>>> datagram is optically scanned into a electronically transmittable >>>> form. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >>>> Steve Di Bias >>>> Network Engineer - Information Systems >>>> Valley Health System - Las Vegas >>>> Office - 702- 369-7594 >>>> Cell - 702-241-1801 >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:42 PM >>>> To: Di Bias, Steve >>>> Cc: Johan Bornman; [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test >>>> >>>> It looks like using RFC 1149 in our data center wasn't effective. >>>> >>>> We're working on identifying the issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >>>> >>>> Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >>>> >>>> Mailto: [email protected] >>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >>>> Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities >>>> >>>> :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. :: >>>> >>>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:57, "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's about the time I noticed it too. Waiting for a response from >>> the >>>> powers that be, hopefully it will get resolved soon >>>>> >>>>> Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am having the same delay, it's been like that for a weeks now I >>> think. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, >>> Steve >>>>> Sent: 27 January 2011 02:24 AM >>>>> To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test >>>>> >>>>> I sent this at 3:03 but it didn't come back to me until 4:23, is >>> anyone >>>> else >>>>> noticing this issue or is it on my end?? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, >>> Steve >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:03 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test >>>>> >>>>> Please disregard, I'm just testing the amount of time this comes back >>>> into >>>>> my inbox, seems my OSL responses are taking 2 to 4 hours to post. Not >>>> sure >>>>> why? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >>>> attachments, >>>>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain >>>>> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, >>> use, >>>>> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this >>>> was >>>>> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >>>> destroy >>>>> all copies of the original message. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >>>> attachments, >>>>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain >>>>> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, >>> use, >>>>> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this >>>> was >>>>> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >>>> destroy >>>>> all copies of the original message. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >>>> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may >>>> contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized >>> review, >>>> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If >>> this >>>> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >>>> destroy all copies of the original message. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >>>> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may >>>> contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized >>> review, >>>> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If >>> this >>>> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >>>> destroy all copies of the original message. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
