THanks everyone !!!
I just love this Forum..

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Amit,
>
> Reason you learn all the routes via 2 different neighbors is because of
> the full mesh and the same bandwidth configuration on all interfaces. The
> routes are all equal cost therefore both showing up in your routing table
> (in this case because auto-summary is disabled on one router you learn 2
> different networks instead of the same network twice with different
> next-hops).
>
> Small addition on auto-summarization:
> Auto-summarization works on the major network boundary. If the
> 172.16.10.0/24 is learned on the 192.x or 10.x interfaces it will be
> auto-summarized by the router advertising it (unless no auto-summary is
> enabled as is the case on the router with the 172.16.10.2 and 192.168.1.2
> interface IP's). This is the reason why you see the 172.16.10.0/24 subnet
> via 192.168.1.2 and not the major network address 172.16.0.0/16 twice as
> would be the case with auto-summarization enabled.
>
> Hope this sort of clarifies it for you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick Keja
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Amit Jp
> Sent: 25 September 2012 16:55
> To: ankit thakrar
> Cc: CC IE
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Eigrp output explanation
>
> /16 and /24 are learnt by different neighbors why not the same neighbor
>
> its coz on some router i have auto summary enabled.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to