Ed, hate to tell you man, but it worked just fine in my lab. I used your exact configs and worked out your P router configs in the middle. I didn't change a *thing* from your CE and PE configs, I just pasted them in to my lab.
Here are my complete configs for the whole lab (plus the .net file): http://pastebin.com/HSv3Knyc R6#sh ver Cisco IOS Software, 3700 Software (C3745-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) It works: R5#show ip route <snip> 50.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 50.50.50.50 is directly connected, Loopback10 55.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 55.55.55.55 is directly connected, Loopback100 5.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 5.5.5.5 is directly connected, Loopback0 6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 6.6.6.6 [20/0] via 10.10.45.4, 00:12:48 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets B 10.66.64.0 [20/0] via 10.10.45.4, 00:12:48 B 10.66.65.0 [20/0] via 10.10.45.4, 00:12:48 B 10.66.66.0 [20/0] via 10.10.45.4, 00:12:48 B 10.10.16.0 [20/0] via 10.10.45.4, 00:12:48 C 10.10.45.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 R5#ping 6.6.6.6 so lo100 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 6.6.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 55.55.55.55 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/17/20 ms R5#trace ip 6.6.6.6 so lo100 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 6.6.6.6 1 10.10.45.4 4 msec 4 msec 8 msec 2 10.10.34.3 [MPLS: Labels 18/18 Exp 0] 4 msec 20 msec 16 msec 3 10.10.23.2 [MPLS: Labels 16/18 Exp 0] 16 msec 20 msec 20 msec 4 10.10.16.1 [AS 1] [MPLS: Label 18 Exp 0] 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec 5 10.10.16.6 [AS 1] 12 msec * 20 msec R6#show ip ro 55.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets R 55.55.55.55 [120/1] via 10.10.16.1, 00:00:24, FastEthernet0/0 6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 6.6.6.6 is directly connected, Loopback0 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets C 10.66.64.0 is directly connected, Loopback102 C 10.66.65.0 is directly connected, Loopback101 C 10.66.66.0 is directly connected, Loopback100 C 10.10.16.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 R6#ping 55.55.55.55 so lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 55.55.55.55, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 6.6.6.6 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/17/24 ms R6#trace ip 55.55.55.55 so lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 55.55.55.55 1 10.10.16.1 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec 2 10.10.12.2 [MPLS: Labels 19/16 Exp 0] 0 msec 24 msec 16 msec 3 10.10.23.3 [MPLS: Labels 16/16 Exp 0] 12 msec 20 msec 16 msec 4 10.10.45.4 [MPLS: Label 16 Exp 0] 16 msec 20 msec 16 msec 5 10.10.45.5 16 msec * 16 msec On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Bodnar, Edward <[email protected]>wrote: > Was tinkering with static routes. Just removed it and still fails. > > > > From: Steve Di Bias [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:33 PM > To: Bodnar, Edward > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] BGP PE - CE configuration > > > > "show ip route rip" on 6(CE) > > "show ip route bgp" on 5(CE) > > > > Post the successful pings from 6(CE) to 5(CE) > > Post the unsuccessful pings from 5(CE) to (6CE) > > > > Also 55.55.55.55 is your CE loopback on R5 so why do you have static route > to some other node? > > > > R5 > > > > interface Loopback100 > > ip address 55.55.55.55 255.255.255.255 > > > > ip route 55.55.55.55 255.255.255.255 10.10.45.4 > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Bodnar, Edward <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > So I have 6 total routers. > > RIP 6(CE)---1(PE)---2(P)---3(P)---4(PE)---5(CE) BGP > > I can ping from rip side to BGP routes. But cannot ping from BGP to rip > side. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Singh [mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 7:23 PM > To: Tony Singh > > Cc: Bodnar, Edward; [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] BGP PE - CE configuration > > Take that back, was thinking a use case at work where we have vrf > definitions to separate routing tables on the CE as we face PE > > Debug ip icmp > > ping vrf B 55.55.55.55 > > From r4 > > What happens > > As bob said check mpls ldp nei, also check not acl copp distribute or > filter list is in the way.. > > -- > BR > > Tony > > Sent from my iPad > > On 2 Feb 2013, at 00:01, Tony Singh <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > Can't see vrf definition on R5 presumably your CE? > > > > -- > > BR > > > > Tony > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On 1 Feb 2013, at 22:24, "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >> I can never seem to get this to work. I can See routes end to end but > I am missing something when I use BGP as the PE - CE protocol. I thought > BGP was supposed to be the easy one J > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> I have full connectivity. And I can see routes Just can't ping. > >> > >> > >> > >> RT4: > >> > >> router bgp 1 > >> > >> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >> > >> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >> > >> neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 1 > >> > >> neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 > >> > >> neighbor 10.10.45.5 remote-as 5 > >> > >> ! > >> > >> address-family ipv4 > >> > >> neighbor 1.1.1.1 activate > >> > >> neighbor 10.10.45.5 activate > >> > >> no auto-summary > >> > >> no synchronization > >> > >> exit-address-family > >> > >> ! > >> > >> address-family vpnv4 > >> > >> neighbor 1.1.1.1 activate > >> > >> neighbor 1.1.1.1 send-community both > >> > >> exit-address-family > >> > >> ! > >> > >> address-family ipv4 vrf B > >> > >> neighbor 10.10.45.5 remote-as 5 > >> > >> neighbor 10.10.45.5 activate > >> > >> no synchronization > >> > >> exit-address-family > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> R5(config-router)#do sh run | s bgp > >> > >> router bgp 5 > >> > >> no synchronization > >> > >> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >> > >> network 55.55.55.55 mask 255.255.255.255 > >> > >> neighbor 10.10.45.4 remote-as 1 > >> > >> no auto-summary > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> > >> > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > > > > > -- > > Thank you, > > > > Steve Di Bias > > CCIE #32840 > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
