Um, No.

I paid $5000 plus hotel, car, etc to take that class to get tips like that.  
The fact that I've seen this question all over the place for months now and NO 
ONE is able to answer it says THOSE people are not being stingy on not 
providing the answer either.  I'm sure I'm not the only person that took an 
Ipexpert class.

Let Vik or Mark Snow give you the answer.

It's basically a CTI RP, and a specially crafted translation pattern.  
Everything must be in the correct partition and calling search space.
Review your CallManager dial-plan pattern operators. It will require an 
operator that is not usually used in every day life.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:47 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different than 
what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ?

I'm not using any IPexpert WBs, if u know how to achieve this  please let us 
know.


Jeremy
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Michael Ciarfello 
<mciarfe...@iplogic.com<mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com>> wrote:

It IS possible.  One of the IPexpert boot camps went over this scenario.  Keep 
working at it.



From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
 On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:31 AM
To: Mike Thompson; ctpresident
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different than 
what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ?



Well so Does sth come to your mind about this scenario ?

Direct to VM should be 2[23]xxx
and also I need to match all unallocated number on DID range which is [23]xxx

so How can I achieve this ?

seems there is no way to do that.


Jeremy

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Mike Thompson 
<mthompson...@gmail.com<mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I don't think you can.  Since TP are all urgent priority, AS SOON as it gets a 
match, it will start routing.  If you start your 'Direct to VM' pattern with a 
# (or something other than [23]) the first won't match and therefore will 
follow the second pattern.



From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
 On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:06 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different than what 
happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ?



Hi,

I have 2 TP

[23]xxx
2[23]xxx

Callmanager will not wait for 5th digit to dial and keep matching on first 
pattern.
Dialed num analyzer shows that it match second pattern correctly when I dial 
22001.

I cleaned up Dial plan report as well, restarted ccm service , but same.

Any idea how can I fix this ?

Jeremy



Reply via email to