Then , Put off "FREE" resources from your website and change this statement.
Online Study List (OSL) is a virtual email community of network engineering professionals working on various networking certifications with a primary focus on the CCIE Routing and Switching (R&S) Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Voice Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab, CCIE Storage Lab, and the CCDE (Cisco Certified Design Expert) certifications. We are a SPAM-Free community of professionals that share the same common goal - to pass certification exams or lab exams and enhance our professional career. And limit it to people who are using ipexpert materials , You didn't use this statement on above lines , did u? Well, better to change website statements and membership policy then send me this email again! Jeremy On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Wayne Lawson <groupst...@ipexpert.com>wrote: > Jeremy, > > This list is meant to be used for our clients - its primary purpose > isn't geared towards helping non-clients with work-related issues. I suggest > you contact Cisco TAC for installation or support issues NOT related to our > products. > > Regards, > Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 > Founder, President & CEO: > - IPexpert, Inc. > - Proctor Labs, Inc. > - Platinum Solutions Group, LLC. > Mailto: <wlaw...@ipexpert.com>wlaw...@ipexpert.com > Mobile: +1.810.334.1564 > > :: Message sent from iPhone. > > On Jun 29, 2009, at 10:46 AM, jeremy co <jeremy.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not using any IPexpert WBs, if u know how to achieve this please let > us know. > > > Jeremy > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Michael Ciarfello <<mciarfe...@iplogic.com> > mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote: > >> It IS possible. One of the IPexpert boot camps went over this >> scenario. Keep working at it. >> >> >> >> *From:* <ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com >> [mailto:<ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *jeremy co >> *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2009 10:31 AM >> *To:* Mike Thompson; ctpresident >> *Cc:* <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different >> than what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ? >> >> >> >> Well so Does sth come to your mind about this scenario ? >> >> Direct to VM should be 2[23]xxx >> and also I need to match all unallocated number on DID range which is >> [23]xxx >> >> so How can I achieve this ? >> >> seems there is no way to do that. >> >> >> Jeremy >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Mike Thompson <<mthompson...@gmail.com> >> mthompson...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I don’t think you can. Since TP are all urgent priority, AS SOON as it >> gets a match, it will start routing. If you start your ‘Direct to VM’ >> pattern with a # (or something other than [23]) the first won’t match and >> therefore will follow the second pattern. >> >> >> >> *From:* <ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com >> [mailto:<ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *jeremy co >> *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2009 10:06 AM >> *To:* <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different >> than what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ? >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I have 2 TP >> >> [23]xxx >> 2[23]xxx >> >> Callmanager will not wait for 5th digit to dial and keep matching on first >> pattern. >> Dialed num analyzer shows that it match second pattern correctly when I >> dial 22001. >> >> I cleaned up Dial plan report as well, restarted ccm service , but same. >> >> Any idea how can I fix this ? >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> > >
