Jeremy,
We don't need your attitude here - this list is a study list for
our students. If you want a public list that's full of spam and vendor
bashing - go to Groupstudy - or, if you want to speak with Scott
Morris - contact him directly. One more abrasive email from you and
your address and IP will be banned.
Regards,
Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder, President & CEO:
- IPexpert, Inc.
- Proctor Labs, Inc.
- Platinum Solutions Group, LLC.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564
:: Message sent from iPhone.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 11:59 AM, jeremy co <jeremy.coo...@gmail.com> wrote:
First of all , I wonder if other ppl on GS and here think like u,
what would happen to the networking community. I wish Scott Morris
reply to your mail not me , he would have much more to say to negate
this kind of attitude.
Second, for internal users it's not possible , simply CCM have no
way of distinguishing between 22001 and 2200 when u entering digits
real time. Not from CCM stand point , from any logic stand point of
view.
if unallocated numbers only should be dialed from PSTN , then it is
possible to do it.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Michael Ciarfello <mciarfe...@iplogic.com
> wrote:
Um, No.
I paid $5000 plus hotel, car, etc to take that class to get tips
like that. The fact that I’ve seen this question all over the place
for months now and NO ONE is able to answer it says THOSE people ar
e not being stingy on not providing the answer either. I’m sure
I’m not the only person that took an Ipexpert class.
Let Vik or Mark Snow give you the answer.
It’s basically a CTI RP, and a specially crafted translation pattern
. Everything must be in the correct partition and calling search sp
ace.
Review your CallManager dial-plan pattern operators. It will require
an operator that is not usually used in every day life.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:47 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is
different than what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ?
I'm not using any IPexpert WBs, if u know how to achieve this
please let us know.
Jeremy
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Michael Ciarfello <mciarfe...@iplogic.com
> wrote:
It IS possible. One of the IPexpert boot camps went over this
scenario. Keep working at it.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:31 AM
To: Mike Thompson; ctpresident
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is
different than what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ?
Well so Does sth come to your mind about this scenario ?
Direct to VM should be 2[23]xxx
and also I need to match all unallocated number on DID range which
is [23]xxx
so How can I achieve this ?
seems there is no way to do that.
Jeremy
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Mike Thompson <mthompson...@gmail.com
> wrote:
I don’t think you can. Since TP are all urgent priority, AS SOON as
it gets a match, it will start routing. If you start your ‘Direct
to VM’ pattern with a # (or something other than [23]) the first won
’t match and therefore will follow the second pattern.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:06 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different
than what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ?
Hi,
I have 2 TP
[23]xxx
2[23]xxx
Callmanager will not wait for 5th digit to dial and keep matching on
first pattern.
Dialed num analyzer shows that it match second pattern correctly
when I dial 22001.
I cleaned up Dial plan report as well, restarted ccm service , but
same.
Any idea how can I fix this ?
Jeremy
