Jonathan, the most interesting bit of this entire thread is that Ben Ng sent you an email with explanation of why you failed!! CCIE exam is notorious for not telling you exactly where you lost points. So this must be a massive help for you. By the way is that some kind of a new process that every candidate will get detailed report of reasons for failure or are you some sort of a VIP customer for them :)
-----Original Message----- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles Sent: Saturday, 1 August 2009 6:40 AM To: Brian Valentine Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 I know, in way too much detail, why I failed... I got an email from Ben Ng explaining it. Jonathan On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Brian Valentine<bkvalent...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know what we expect Jonathan to tell us. What we really want to ask > is something we don't really want to know and something he really can't tell > us anyway because of NDA. > > Jonathan, bummer that you failed. It sounds like you know why you failed -- > which is a very good thing. Better luck on your next attempt. > > I will add this. I took the R&S exam last year and passed on my first > attempt. I also thought the exam was a fair test of knowledge and skill. > If you are well prepared in terms of understanding the technology deeply, > have a plan of how to attack your lab, and follow your plan, you certainly > CAN get 80 points in 8 hours. Now, I realize it is a different exam, but I > would expect the voice exam to be similar in that it will be achievable. > Cisco doesn't want to know primarily that you can do stupid tricks with > routers and phones. Now I haven't sat the voice lab exam yet, but I would > be extremely surprised and disappointed if there were 30 points of stupid > phone tricks. Cisco wants to know that you understand the technology deeply > enough that you can configure to a set of complex requirements. Bottom line > -- they want to know that you are an expert. To an expert the exam should > seem "easy". Of course, you could always have a tricky question or two, > but remember that you don't need 100% to pass. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Damisch > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 2:17 PM > To: Jonathan Charles; Tanner Ezell > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 > > Thanks for that last bit of info. I will be sure to work on the [deleted by > NDA] topics. Those are my weak areas. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan > Charles > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:05 PM > To: Tanner Ezell > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 > > Well, the [deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] than I expected, but > [deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] and [deleted by NDA] was also > [deleted by NDA] > > > Jonathan > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tanner Ezell<tanner.ez...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> So basically, you had thoughts, but can't share, and you did things, but > you >> cannot tell us >> So all in all, <blank, details removed> >> :) >> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben >>> Ng telling me why...) >>> >>> It was actually easier than I thought it was going to be... and >>> remarkably fair... >>> >>> I made a mistake that broke something and that is the primary reason I >>> didn't pass (no, I cannot tell you what the mistake was, or even what >>> was broken...). >>> >>> I will say the exam was not what I expected (nope, can't tell you what >>> I expected it to be...) >>> >>> I am retaking it 9/1 in RTP >>> >>> And for even less information, see http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Jonathan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use > of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain > information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure > under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify > Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and delete or destroy all copies and > the original document. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
