Okay, I'll bite...
So are you looking at like a TEHO solution. If the TEHO gateway is down, then send to local so the call goes through From: c george [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:12 AM To: Steve Sarrick; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local route group question i beleive it is the other way around. The local group would be the 2nd choice not the 1st. The primary route group (gw) would the 1st in the list. Respectfully Charles George ________________________________ Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:08:15 -0400 From: [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local route group question I'm not the expert in this, but if I understand what you are asking.... The Standard Local Route Group would be set first in your Route List and then a secondary option would be set in the route list. In the event your Standard Local Device fails, the calls based on that route pattern would use the next available option. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert McGhee Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local route group question I've been struggling with this question and haven't been able to find a clear answer; can a local route group support call redundancy? So if all pstn connectivity is down on a device pools local route group can calls be re-routed out another gateway? ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Snow Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:06 AM To: SYED HUSSAIN Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP snooping limit rate for Voice traffic... As noted in the CUCM SRND here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/security.html #wp1045687 Cisco doesn't set a "best practices" rule. Instead they say (and rightfully so) that it depends on your Security Policy. You would really have to have more information such as: - How many phones on the DHCP Subnet? - How often do they renew their leases? - Model of the switch? All in all, as with most things in security that you wish to limit, you really need to establish a baseline for your own DHCP Voice traffic, and then create a limit slightly higher than what is "normal" DHCP traffic (in PPS). HTH, -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.309.413.4097 Mailto: [email protected] -- Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities -- IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- On Aug 26, 2009, at 3:33 PM, SYED HUSSAIN wrote: Hi Guys, Can someone tell me what is the recommended DHCP snooping limit rate for Voice traffic? Thanks _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> ________________________________ Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you're up to on Facebook. Find out more. <http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTA GL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009>
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
