Michael and Farkas,

Okay, I have thought about what you mentioned.  Here is my revised
approach.  Let me know what you think about this way:

!
mls qos map policed-dscp  0 24 to 8
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos
!
!
class-map match-any SCCP-Traffic
  match ip dscp cs3  af31
!
!
policy-map POLICE-MAP
  class SCCP-Traffic
    police 320000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
   set dscp cs3
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/6
  service-policy input POLICE-MAP
!

What is the signifigance of matching both ip dscp cs3  af31?  Since I have
match-any will it match on both?  New CUCM 7.x servers should send SCCP out
at cs3 correct?

Thanks,

Alex


2009/11/11 "Farkas Péter" <wormh...@sch.bme.hu>

> AutoQoS cannot be configured until service-policy is attached to the
> interface so you cannot use it for correction. Also, AutoQos does not work
> on Eth.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Ciarfello <mciarfe...@iplogic.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:56 pm
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
> To: Alex Hannah <alex.han...@gmail.com>, "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
> <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>
>
> > Here are some hints for you to research:
> >
> >  I believe there is an error in one of the class-maps.  See if you can
> find it or agree.
> >
> >  I believe you have too much extra stuff configured, let’s eliminate the
> unneeded stuff.
> >
> >  How about use match IP protocol instead of access-lists?
> >
> >  Are you sure your access-list is correct for the inbound / outbound
> traffic you have?
> >
> >  I think the data vlan people are going to be pissed and complain about
> slowness.  I know it’s
> > a lab.  I believe you can get the entire config down to a much simplier
> 10-15 lines instead of
> > all the stuff you have.
> >
> >  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
>  >  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:41 PM
> >  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
> >
> >  Hello everyone.
> >
> >  I am attempting to create the following QoS policy on a 3750  port with
> an IP Phone plugged in
> > behind it.
> >
> >  The policy will police signalling ( SCCP ) 32k down to 8k and remark to
> DSCP 8.  I have read
> > through most of the SRND guide for the 3750, the model I am following is
> the:
> >
> >  2970/3560/3750–Conditionally-Trusted IP Phone + PC + Scavenger (Basic)
> Model Configuration on
> > page 105 of the 3.3 QoS SRND.
> >
> >  Can anyone validate my work below and let me know if you think this
> meets those requirements?
> > Also, in this scenerio, Auto Qos would not need to be applied over top of
> it correct?
> >
> >  mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
> >  mls qos map policed-dscp 0 24 to 8
> >
> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-VOICE
> >   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-VOICE
> >   match ip dscp ef
> >
> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
> >   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name
> VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALLING
> >   match ip dscp cs3 af31
> >
> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-ANY
> >    match access-group name VVLAN-ANY
> >
> >  policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
> >   class VVLAN-VOICE
> >    set ip dscp 46
> >    police 128000 8000
> >    exceed-action drop
> >   class VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
> >    set ip dscp 24
> >    police 32000 8000
> >    exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
> >   class VVLAN-ANY
> >    set ip dscp 0
> >    police 32000 8000
> >    exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
> >
> >   class class-default
> >    set ip dscp 0
> >    police 5000000 8000
> >    exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
> >
> >  interface FastEthernet0/1
> >   service-policy input IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
> >
> >  ip access list extended VVLAN-VOICE
> >   permit udp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 16384 32767
> >
> >  ip access list extended VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
> >   permit tcp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 2000 2002
> >
> >  ip access list extended VVLAN-ANY
> >   permit ip x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any
> >
> >
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >  Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to