Which parameters are not used for IOS GW? Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2013, at 11:45 PM, Robert Thomas <tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Those parameters are not used for IOS Gateways. They were used for 6608 T1 > Cards, but have no effect on other ISR MGCP GW. > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Ricardo <ricardoareval...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If we need a fractional PRI we use pri-group timeslots 1-6 (or the amount of >> channels you will need) service mgcp. + the other MGCP commands, but no >> these: >> >> >> ccm-manager config server X.X.X.X >> ccm-manager config >> >> The big BUT with this workaround: not supported by TAC. >> >> I guess this option still exists in CUCM because since PRI fractionals are >> not officialy supported by Cisco, this would be the only "official" way to >> configure them. So you would use the full PRI and busy'ed them out with the >> maintenance channel option. However we know that only some Channels will >> come up, and the CUCM wont send calls to unused channels and more >> importantly wont report any error because those channels are in maintenance. >> >> //r.a. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Karen Johnson <karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca> >> wrote: >>> Thanks Ricardo, >>> >>> so if we ever need fractional T1/E1 , we only need to use "pri-group >>> timeslots 1-6 service mgcp " on GW. >>> >>> But why the :busyout B-channel still exist in UCM service parameter ? is >>> there any IOS GW that can't do above? >>> >>> tks >>> K >>> >>> From: Ricardo <ricardoareval...@gmail.com> >>> To: Karen Johnson <karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca> >>> Cc: Robert Thomas <tho...@gmail.com>; "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" >>> <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:30:11 AM >>> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Change B-Channel Maintenance Status >>> >>> Normally I don't post unless there is something to be said. >>> >>> Sorry to say this is not old story. Cisco doesn't support fractional MGCP >>> PRIs, that is for both E1 and T1, and only 5 endpoints with the b-channel >>> maintenance status are allowed per cluster. >>> >>> Please take a look at this >>> >>> https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-2038 in it you will find the BUGs: >>> CSCed41207 and CSCdw29259. >>> >>> As a workaround you can use partial configuration when defining the PRI: >>> pri-group timeslots 1-6 service mgcp >>> Just dont use these commands: >>> >>> ccm-manager config server X.X.X.X >>> ccm-manager config >>> >>> Otherwise the CUCM will keep modifying the PRI to use all the channels, >>> using more DSPs than the gateway was supposed to. >>> >>> Be careful. This condition still exists in real life, especially in >>> countries were PRI/E1 is offered. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Cisco's recommendation is to use H323 instead of MGCP. >>> //r.a. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Karen Johnson <karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca> >>> wrote: >>> tks Robert and Bill. >>> >>> so in exam i will leave to default and not worry on this : "busy out" if >>> (Inhibit re-starts at PRI initialization is checked) >>> >>> From: Robert Thomas <tho...@gmail.com> >>> To: Karen Johnson <karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca> >>> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >>> Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 9:42:51 PM >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Change B-Channel Maintenance Status >>> >>> Karen, >>> >>> Those parameters are old story. The were used back in the 6608 days, have >>> no use on the current MGCP GW. If you configure your PRI as fractional with >>> less timeslots, CUCM would audit the port and the GW report back an error >>> for that endpoint, CUCM will then mark it out of service automatically. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Karen Johnson <karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca> >>> wrote: >>> when do MGCP, i come across service parameter "Change B-Channel Maintenance >>> Status" and they only have 5 box. >>> >>> - does that mean in one cluster we can have 5 GW that use partial PRI with >>> MGCP ? >>> - if i plan to use partial PRI in MGCP, do i need to also "busy out " >>> above paramater or >>> "pri-group timeslots 1-12,16 service mgcp" command in GW is enough? >>> >>> - based on UCM help page, we only need use "busy out" if (Inhibit re-starts >>> at PRI initialization is checked) >>> I just try to make sense of this statement >>> >>> tks >>> K. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/ >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Robert Thomas Zamora >>> tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 >>> http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 >>> CCNP, CCNP Voice >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/ >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/ > > > > -- > Robert Thomas Zamora > tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 > http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 > CCNP, CCNP Voice > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
