Hi,
I can turn it back on as easily as it was turned off - as I said, several people had negative comments, so I decided to to turn it off for now. If there's more positive than negative impact - I would be glad to turn it back on. Artem _____ From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anastassis Perrakis Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 4:48 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4 Wiki Just to clarify, since I feel I got misunderstood, that what Artem writes below, is the only kind of 'validation' I would also suggest. Real names though, from real institutes or companies, no yahoo/gmail aliases, so people can check the sources of the articles. A. PS I actually think that Artem's wiki could had served as an invaluable testbed and repository of contributions until something else is up and running. I am a bit disappointed it went down when I decided to try starting the ARP/wARP wiki page ;-) On 27 Jul 2007, at 20:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For all it's worth, I generally agree with the proponents of the more "open" approach to wiki - such as articles could be written by anyone who has a 'real name registration'.
