There are almost always better choices than Tris buffer.

Mo Cleland used to call it “Trash” buffer.  He is no longer with us, but today 
I will happily carry that flag in his honor.

Tris may show up in your crystal structure, especially at carbohydrate binding 
sites.
Tris may be a surprisingly strong competitive inhibitor in your enzyme assays, 
especially as above.
Tris has an absolutely miserably bad change in pKa vs. temperature.  It is 
larger than -0.03 pKa/dT(C).  It can be a catastrophically bad choice for 
flash-freezing protein aliquots.

If you taken the time and incurred the expense of preparing a macromolecular 
sample for crystallization studies, and you are worried about the price 
difference between Tris and HEPES, in my opinion you are absolutely worried 
about the wrong things.

Why are people substantially concerned about the buffering capacity of a buffer 
for final sample preparation?  You have a purified protein, presumably without 
substrate present.  Exactly what do you think is generating or absorbing 
hydrogen ions in that solution?  Oxidation of reducing agent should be about 
the only thing that is taxing the buffer.  From the example below, oxidation of 
5 mM BME will put some pressure on the buffer, but unfortunately Tris 
accelerates the oxidation of BME relative, to, say, HEPES. And surely you 
aren’t just letting the protein sit and oxidize in the refrigerator? Oh you 
might be since when you tried to snap freeze it in Tris, it turned into cooked 
egg white because the pH went to over 10 before it vitrified.  
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031942200801429)

Isn’t the whole point to use a small amount of buffer so you can easily push 
the pH around in crystallization screens? (At which point the sample is usually 
in 100+ mM buffer.)

On Mar 29, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Hughes, Jon 
<jon.hug...@bot3.bio.uni-giessen.de<mailto:jon.hug...@bot3.bio.uni-giessen.de>> 
wrote:

...it's just a wonderful tradition! there's an interesting description of the 
history of tris in maniatis....
cheers
jon

Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von David 
Briggs
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 17:53
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] protein precipitation reg

It doesn't cost as much as HEPES, iirc.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, 16:36 Keller, Jacob, 
<kell...@janelia.hhmi.org<mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>> wrote:
A bit off topic, but I’ve always wondered how TRIS got so popular what with 
it’s pKa of 8.3—does anyone know?

JPK

From: CCP4 bulletin board 
[mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>] On Behalf Of Roger 
Rowlett
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 11:10 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] protein precipitation reg

What are you dialyzing against? Your storage solution should typically be 
buffered away from the pI and contain at least a small amount of kosmotropic 
salt, e.g. NaCl. Some proteins will require additional stabilizing/solubilizing 
agents such as glycerol or reducing agents. FYI, Tris-Cl, pH 7.5 has very 
little buffer capacity (about 15% of the total concentration in the acid 
direction). We typically use Tris-Cl pH 8.0, which is closer to the Tris pKa 
and has good buffer capacity for both acid and base. For pH 7.5 we would 
typically use HEPES as the storage buffer.

_______________________________________
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon & Dorothy Kline Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu<mailto:rrowl...@colgate.edu>
On 3/29/2017 9:38 AM, Akilandeswari Gopalan wrote:
Dear all,
I am a PhD student doing structural studies on a few proteins from 
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The gene encoding the proteins I work on are cloned 
into pet22b with c terminal His tag. the proteins are expressing well. upon 
purification I am getting good yield of protein but during dialysis, the 
proteins precipitate. Kindly suggest some solutions to avoid aggregation. pI of 
one protein is 9.7 and that of the other is 5.6
I am using 25mM Tris pH 7.5 and 100 mM NaCl buffer with 5mM 
beta-mercaptoethanol and 0.5% triton x 100 for lysis, the same buffer with 
20-30mM imidazole for washing and 300mM imidazole for eluting the proteins.

Thank you
Regards
Akila

--
Akilandeswari G

--


Fehler! Es wurde kein Dateiname angegeben.
<image001.jpg>



David Briggs PhD
Fehler! Es wurde kein Dateiname 
angegeben.<http://angegeben.about.me/david_briggs>about.me/david_briggs<http://angegeben.about.me/david_briggs>


<image002.jpg>


Reply via email to