On 2/2/23 05:54, emanuel stiebler via cctalk wrote:
On 2023-02-02 04:38, David Brownlee wrote:
> That reminds me (looks at 43.5T of zfs pool that has not
had a scrub
> since 2021).
>
> It can be nice to have a filesystem which handles
redundancy and also
> the option to occasionally read all the data, check end
to end
> checksums (in the unlikely case a device returns a
successful read
> with bad data), and fixup everything. Does not eliminate
the need for
> remote copies, but gives a little extra confidence that
the master
> copy is still what it should be :)
So, what else do you guys use, to make sure your data is
safe for the years to come?
I do many backups on blu-ray DVD's, the theory is if they
start to go bad, maybe partial recovery of important files
will be possible due to having many copies on DVD.
This is getting a bit difficult as the amount of stuff to be
backed up is just a bit too big for a single blu-ray disc.
I also do much more frequent backups to a large hard drive.
Jon
