> 
> I don't think we can draw any conclusions from voltage measurements
> around the TIP121 without the -12V line being approximately correct or at
> the very least being negative.
> 
> It's collector voltage being 0V on the good PSU suggests there is no current
> flowing through the parallel 20R resistors and therefore no emitter-collector
> current through the TIP121 so it's not being switched on meaning that it's
> driver doesn't feel the need to pull the -12V line down nearer 0V because it's
> already low enough.  (Maybe having a load is enough to keep it at the correct
> level and the shunt regulator only starts doing stuff if the load is less than
> expected or removed altogether? Or maybe the -12V line is not present when
> the test was done?)
> 
> The collector voltage of the TIP121 on the bad PSU being slightly positive is
> probably due to the voltage on it's emitter (ie the -12V line) being positive
> instead of negative which makes it's bias conditions all wrong and any
> measurements around it mostly meaningless.



I am going to read your answer more carefully later. But I wanted to check one 
thing. I measured the base-emitter voltage as negative in both cases, and yet 
the TIP121 appears to be conducting on the bad PSU. Surely that means that the 
TIP121 is not working correctly?

> 
> How about applying -12V or slightly less from a bench supply current limited
> to about 150mA to the -12V line and seeing what happens?  If the PSU
> and/or -12V load tries to draw more than that there would seem to be a real
> overload and further investigation is needed to find out what is drawing the
> current.
> 
> Measure the voltage across the zener diode in the -12V regulator and
> compare with the good PSU.  Also compare the voltage across the parallel
> 20R resistors.
> A larger voltage here would indicate more current being drawn through the
> TIP121.
> 
> Under these conditions, there shouldn't be any voltage across the 51R
> current sensing resistor for the -12V line.  If there is, it suggests there 
> could
> be reverse leakage through the -12V rectifier diode.
> 
> 
> However, Brent's calculations show that the current trip value for the -12V
> line is as low as 1.3mA and I can't see any reason to disagree with his
> calculations or his conclusion that this seems very low (except that another
> tiny smidgen of current is available from the negative startup supply but this
> won't really have any bearing on things). If this is really the case, then 
> placing
> something like a 5k6 resistor across the -12V line on the good PSU should
> cause enough current to flow for the trip to operate.  Finding this level of
> leakage in the failed PSU is not going to be easy.
> 
> On the other hand, if this test doesn't trip it, then please look very 
> closely at
> the resistors and connections to the inputs of E3d and verify that they are as
> described on the circuit diagram.
> 
> It seems very strange indeed to have a trip value as low as 1.3mA combined
> with a shunt regulator whose method of regulation is to pull the voltage
> down by drawing current from the supply line.  Perhaps the shunt regulator
> might be able to pull enough current to cause the trip to operate if the -12V
> line was too high (in the negative sense) or if the shunt regulator was under
> the mistaken impression that the -12V line was too high?
> 
> (This is a bit unlikely but the 115V/230V switch is set correctly, isn't it?)
> 
> On the other other hand, if the manual says that the -12V line is supposed to
> be able to supply 150mA, then it doesn't make sense for the current trip to
> operate at 1.3mA and we must be going wrong somewhere.
> 
> Regards,
> Peter.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Peter.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rob
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Rob Jarratt <robert.jarr...@ntlworld.com>
> > > > Sent: 02 May 2023 08:19
> > > > To: 'Mattis Lind' <mattisl...@gmail.com>; r...@jarratt.me.uk;
> > > > 'General
> > > > Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > > > Subject: RE: [cctalk] Re: Rainbow H7842 PSU Fault
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That’s a good idea, I will try that
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Mattis Lind < <mailto:mattisl...@gmail.com>
> > > > mattisl...@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7:55 AM
> > > > To:  <mailto:r...@jarratt.me.uk> r...@jarratt.me.uk; General
> Discussion:
> > > > On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts < <mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > > > cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > > > Cc: Rob Jarratt < <mailto:robert.jarr...@ntlworld.com>
> > > > robert.jarr...@ntlworld.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [cctalk] Re: Rainbow H7842 PSU Fault
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not quite sure what you mean here. I had advice from a friend to
> > > > bench test the control module by providing 14V to the input of the
> > > > 7812. On the good PSU I can see the PWM operate, on the bad one
> > > > the PWM is
> > > shutdown.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And what happens if you feed in exactly 12 V on the output of the
> 7812?
> > > Would the PWM work then? By using a lab supply you could check if
> > > the circuit is sensitive to variation in the 12V supply.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > /Mattis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Rob
> > > >
> > > >

Reply via email to