why is it, especially in this presidential election, the first and most
prominent arguments are why one particular candidate is not fit to be president
... then at the very end they will sneak in a reason why another candidate is
better to be the president ...
I have seen and heard this especially in the republican debates and questions
posed to candidates and even in the democratic debates ... they first answer
questions and issues by saying why trump should not be the president before
they answer why they should be the one ...
I find that very strange ... the need to lift ones stature requires to put down
another ...
-------------------------
if you are not scared in what is happening with the relationship of muslims
with other people around the world, then you are entitled to your own opinion
and stand ... as I am entitled to my own fears ...
--------------------------
each one of us will have our own opinion as to what we think the primary role
of govt: be it the president, congress, or judicial branches ... and based on
our opinion we would be looking for candidates whose narrative fits ours ...
each candidate will have so many things they will bring to the table ... and we
will assess each issue accordingly and vote who has the most narrative that
fits ours ...
--------------------------in all my posts, I have stated that in my opinion the
primary role of govt is to protect and defend the freedom, the right to life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness of ALL its people ... not just latinos, not
just minorities, not just muslims, not just catholics, not just women, not just
... but ALL ...and the govt should protect and defend such way of life not only
from its enemies but from each other as well ...
and any policy that endangers such way of life must be reviewed, halted or
stopped permanently ...
-------------------this email obviously points to the current events at orlando
... re muslims, mass murders, and gun control ...
all of a sudden this became an important issue? ... why because it happened ...
before they talked about so many things: free this free that ... protect women
... etc...
--------------------------we all got an email regarding terror events that all
seem to have one common denominator: muslim background ... no one seems to
have refuted that email ...
if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, moves like a duck, how can
watching out for a duck be racist or profiling? ...
maybe I am giving too much credit to the presidential candidates esp trump ...
that his statement re banning muslim immigrants has to do with as he said:
stopping it until we know what we are doing? ... bringing in legally or
otherwise, people that may endanger the way of life of american and its people
--------------------yes, we can only do so much about mass murders ... in fact,
it seems to be the FBI that dropped the ball on this one on closing the books
on this guy ... maybe they should keep those books open ...
-------------------yes I agree, certain gun control is in order ... I agree
that assault weapons should be banned ... but I guarantee you if one wants one,
and badly enough, someone will offer it for sale and will be able to get one
------------------yes people are resonating to trump as they did in 2008 when
someone with no experience, no accomplishments, offered hope and change and got
elected twice ... they are willing to take a chance now on someone who is not
in the establishment ... who promises not to be the same old same old ... will
have to wait and see if ever we will see one who will keep their promises ...
---------------------
vote your conscience accordingly ... your country needs it ...
balc
From: Cesar Lumba <[email protected]>
To: World-Wide Fil Alliance <[email protected]>;
HS59LaSalle <[email protected]>; Archersnook
<[email protected]>; "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>; 62ndforum <[email protected]>; Augusto
Jamora <[email protected]>; CFGG Assoc. *CFGG CFGG
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 6:25 AM
Subject: Trump's Hate Agenda
Republican presidential candidate Trump's reaction to the carnage in Orlando,
while predictable, is still jarring in its utter lack of credibility and
utility. Here is a guy who is aspiring to become the free world's leader in
about seven months, when he is inaugurated as the President of the United
States should he win the election in November.
He doesn't have a clue on what he can say and not say as a potential world
leader. He is yakking that he is right about his plan to ban Muslims from
entering the United States in the future should he become president. More than
one billion Muslims in the world - banned from entering the U.S. if Trump
becomes president. How many Muslims have been responsible for the murder of
innocents in the U.S.? No more than fifty. Out of more than 1 billion.
How many home-grown, non-Muslim terrorists and serial killers responsible for
mass murders in the U.S.? Many more than the Muslims.
The fact is, you can't prevent mass murders. Insanity will always be with us.
Mentally unstable people will snap and commit mass murder. People who are
ultra-religious will snap and commit mass murder. If you don't believe this,
examine the backgrounds of those who murder abortion doctors. Many of those
are born-again Christians. Do we call born-again Christians terrorists because
of those murders?
How does society protect against such people, knowing that it cannot protect
against all of them, but as Hillary Clinton has said, society can protect
against some and therefore save lives?
1. Through better investigating techniques. The guy who murdered innocents in
the Pulse night club in Orlando had been investigated by the FBI twice in 2013,
but the FBI found nothing and did not continue its surveillance. The FBI was
ineffective. Hillary is right: the FBI must do a much better job.
2. An assault rifle ban must be in effect immediately. A campaign against the
NRA (National Rifle Association), which opposes the ban, must be a part of the
Hillary campaign for president.
Trump says that if there is a ban against the sale of assault weapons, only the
criminals and crazies will have assault weapons. This is total nonsense.
Criminals and crazies buy their assault weapons shortly before they commit
their mass murders. If they cannot buy the weapons, what will they use?
Glocks? They won't be able to kill as many.
And has there ever been a case where the innocents were able to prevent the
mass killings because the innocents also had assault weapons? Trump says the
solution is to arm the innocents with assault weapons so they can defend
themselves. Who would give kids money to buy assault weapons so they can take
those weapons along with them when they have fun in a night club? Imagine kids
toting assault weapons in the streets, in churches, in restaurants. Everyone
with an assault weapon walking around in parks, in schools, in government
buildings, in buses and taxis.
This is the world that Trump envisions. Trump says private citizens must have
the capability to buy assault weapons because they need those weapons to
protect themselves against the terrorists and mass murderers.
So much for that insanity.
I suggest that private individuals who already own assault weapons must be
prohibited from selling such weapons to private individuals and groups without
an official permit from the ATF to conduct the sale.
All existing assault weapons in the hands of private individuals and groups
must be registered with the ATF, like cars are registered each year in the
state where they are located. This is to make sure that the weapons are still
in possession of those who originally bought them.
And Trump must shut up about President Obama. He insinuates that Obama is a
secret Muslim because Obama can't utter the term "radical Islamic terrorism."
Trump is absolutely incapable of projecting himself as a responsible leader.
Imagine if Trump as president starts to call the Muslim terrorists as a part of
the larger Radical Islamic Terrorism. The whole Islamic world would react with
more hatred for Americans because what the term suggests is that there is a
movement within the Islamic religion that is radicalized and is terrorist.
The international Islamic community rejects the tactics of the terrorists in
their midst and are fighting great wars against ISIS, or ISIL, or Dash. Before
that the Islamic community fought Al Qaida. They are also fighting the Taliban.
The Islamic community denies that the terrorists in their midst are Islamic.
They are not Islamic, according to the Muslims, just as the IRA in Ireland,
though made up of Catholics, did not represent Catholic teachings. There is no
place in Islam for people who use that religion to commit mass murder,
according to those who practice that religion.
No responsible world leader calls the terrorists Radical Islamic Terrorists.
Why would Obama be the first one to do that?
As private individuals, we can have the opinion that there is in fact a faction
of the Islamic world that is terrorist. And we can say that - privately. But
for a leader of a country, especially the United States, to say that, it would
lead to a real war with the 1 billion Muslims, most of whom are disowning the
terrorists in their midst.
The fact that Obama recognizes that the world's Muslims have a right to a good
name for their religion means that Obama is a Muslim, according to Trump. When
one defends the rights of African-Americans, does that make one a black man or
woman? When one argues for the rights of women to better pay and better
treatment, does that make one a woman? When one argues that gays have a right
to exist and do whatever it is they want to do when they are together, does
that make one gay?
Trump's logic is child-like. It's really a wonder that he is now the
presumptive nominee for president of one of the two major political parties in
the U.S. The Republican voters today should have their heads examined. They
have nominated a man who very likely descended from the same branch of the
Germanic nation that thinks of itself as the superior race who can bully
everyone that the nation happens to hate. His hate speech is reminiscent of
another leader who comes from that Germanic nation: Hitler.
Cesar L
PS Before the Trumps became Trump, they were the Drumpfs, U.S. immigrants from
Germany.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Center for Good Governance" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/center-for-good-governance.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Center for Good Governance" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/center-for-good-governance.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
