There are scripts to integrate existing device into bcache (not sure how well it works).
Jan > On 02 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Emmanuel Florac <eflo...@intellique.com> wrote: > > > bcache has the advantage of being natively integrated to the linux > kernel, feeling more "proper". It seems slightly faster than flashcache > too, but YMMV. However you cannot add bcache as an afterthought to an > existing volume, but you can set up flashcache this way apparently. > I had a few crashes with bcache on different machines but never had any > corruption, so it looks production-safe. > > > Le Thu, 2 Jul 2015 07:48:48 -0300 > German Anders <gand...@despegar.com> écrivait: > >> The idea is to cache rbd at a host level. Also could be possible to >> cache at the osd level. We have high iowait and we need to lower it a >> bit, since we are getting the max from our sas disks 100-110 iops per >> disk (3TB osd's), any advice? Flashcache? > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique > | Intellique > | <eflo...@intellique.com> > | +33 1 78 94 84 02 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
