Here is the output of your snippet:
[root@mon01 ceph-conf]# bash /tmp/ceph_foo.sh
6 osd.10
52 ops are blocked > 4194.3 sec on osd.17
9 ops are blocked > 2097.15 sec on osd.10
4 ops are blocked > 1048.58 sec on osd.10
39 ops are blocked > 262.144 sec on osd.10
19 ops are blocked > 131.072 sec on osd.10
6 ops are blocked > 65.536 sec on osd.10
2 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec on osd.10
Here is some backfilling info:
[root@mon01 ceph-conf]# ceph status
cluster 55ebbc2d-c5b7-4beb-9688-0926cefee155
health HEALTH_WARN
5 pgs backfilling
5 pgs degraded
5 pgs stuck degraded
5 pgs stuck unclean
5 pgs stuck undersized
5 pgs undersized
122 requests are blocked > 32 sec
recovery 2361/1097929 objects degraded (0.215%)
recovery 5578/1097929 objects misplaced (0.508%)
monmap e1: 3 mons at
{mon01=10.20.57.10:6789/0,mon02=10.20.57.11:6789/0,mon03=10.20.57.12:6789/0}
election epoch 58, quorum 0,1,2 mon01,mon02,mon03
osdmap e6511: 24 osds: 21 up, 21 in; 5 remapped pgs
flags sortbitwise,require_jewel_osds
pgmap v6474659: 2592 pgs, 5 pools, 333 GB data, 356 kobjects
1005 GB used, 20283 GB / 21288 GB avail
2361/1097929 objects degraded (0.215%)
5578/1097929 objects misplaced (0.508%)
2587 active+clean
5 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling
[root@mon01 ceph-conf]# ceph pg dump_stuck unclean
ok
pg_stat state up up_primary acting acting_primary
3.5c2 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling [17,2,10] 17
[17,2] 17
3.54a active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling [10,19,2] 10
[10,17] 10
5.3b active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling [3,19,0] 3
[10,17] 10
5.b3 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling [10,19,2] 10
[10,17] 10
3.180 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling [17,10,6] 17
[22,19] 22
Most of the back filling is was caused by restarting osds to clear blocked IO.
Here are some of the blocked IOs:
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:36.978559 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9362 : cluster [WRN] slow request 60.834494 seconds old, received at 2017-09-07
13:28:36.143920: osd_op(client.114947.0:2039090 5.e637a4b3 (undecoded)
ack+read+balance_reads+skiprwlocks+known_if_redirected e6511) currently
queued_for_pg
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:36.978565 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9363 : cluster [WRN] slow request 240.661052 seconds old, received at
2017-09-07 13:25:36.317363: osd_op(client.246934107.0:3 5.f69addd6 (undecoded)
ack+read+known_if_redirected e6511) currently queued_for_pg
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:36.978571 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9364 : cluster [WRN] slow request 240.660763 seconds old, received at
2017-09-07 13:25:36.317651: osd_op(client.246944377.0:2 5.f69addd6 (undecoded)
ack+read+known_if_redirected e6511) currently queued_for_pg
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:36.978576 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9365 : cluster [WRN] slow request 240.660675 seconds old, received at
2017-09-07 13:25:36.317740: osd_op(client.246944377.0:3 5.f69addd6 (undecoded)
ack+read+known_if_redirected e6511) currently queued_for_pg
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:42.979367 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9366 : cluster [WRN] 72 slow requests, 3 included below; oldest blocked for >
1820.342287 secs
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:42.979373 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9367 : cluster [WRN] slow request 30.606290 seconds old, received at 2017-09-07
13:29:12.372999: osd_op(client.115008.0:996024003 5.e637a4b3 (undecoded)
ondisk+write+skiprwlocks+known_if_redirected e6511) currently queued_for_pg
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:42.979377 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9368 : cluster [WRN] slow request 30.554317 seconds old, received at 2017-09-07
13:29:12.424972: osd_op(client.115020.0:1831942 5.39f2d3b (undecoded)
ack+read+known_if_redirected e6511) currently queued_for_pg
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:42.979383 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9369 : cluster [WRN] slow request 30.368086 seconds old, received at 2017-09-07
13:29:12.611204: osd_op(client.115014.0:73392774 5.e637a4b3 (undecoded)
ack+read+balance_reads+skiprwlocks+known_if_redirected e6511) currently
queued_for_pg
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:43.979553 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9370 : cluster [WRN] 73 slow requests, 1 included below; oldest blocked for >
1821.342499 secs
/var/log/ceph/ceph.log:2017-09-07 13:29:43.979559 osd.10 10.20.57.15:6806/7029
9371 : cluster [WRN] slow request 30.452344 seconds old, received at 2017-09-07
13:29:13.527157: osd_op(client.115011.0:483954528 5.e637a4b3 (undecoded)
ack+read+balance_reads+skiprwlocks+known_if_redirected e6511) currently
queued_for_pg
From: David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 1:17 PM
To: Matthew Stroud <mattstr...@overstock.com>, "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com"
<ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Blocked requests
I would recommend pushing forward with the update instead of rolling back.
Ceph doesn't have a track record of rolling back to a previous version.
I don't have enough information to really make sense of the ceph health detail
output. Like are the osds listed all on the same host? Over time of watching
this output, are some of the requests clearing up? Are there any other
patterns? I put the following in a script and run it in a watch command to try
and follow patterns when I'm plagued with blocked requests.
output=$(ceph --cluster $cluster health detail | grep 'ops are blocked' |
sort -nrk6 | sed 's/ ops/+ops/' | sed 's/ sec/+sec/' | column -t -s'+')
echo "$output" | grep -v 'on osd'
echo "$output" | grep -Eo osd.[0-9]+ | sort -n | uniq -c | grep -v ' 1 '
echo "$output" | grep 'on osd'
Why do you have backfilling? You haven't mentioned that you have any
backfilling yet. Installing an update shouldn't cause backfilling, but it's
likely related to your blocked requests.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:24 PM Matthew Stroud
<mattstr...@overstock.com<mailto:mattstr...@overstock.com>> wrote:
Well in the meantime things have gone from bad to worse now the cluster isn’t
rebuilding and clients are unable to pass IO to the cluster. When this first
took place, we started rolling back to 10.2.7, though that was successful, it
didn’t help with the issue. Here is the command output:
HEALTH_WARN 39 pgs backfill_wait; 5 pgs backfilling; 43 pgs degraded; 43 pgs
stuck degraded; 44 pgs stuck unclean; 43 pgs stuck undersized; 43 pgs
undersized; 367 requests are blocked > 32 sec; 14 osds have slow requests;
recovery 4678/1097738 objects degraded (0.426%); recovery 10364/1097738 objects
misplaced (0.944%)
pg 3.624 is stuck unclean for 1402.022837, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [12,9]
pg 3.587 is stuck unclean for 2536.693566, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [18,13]
pg 3.45f is stuck unclean for 1421.178244, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [14,10]
pg 3.41a is stuck unclean for 1505.091187, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [9,23]
pg 3.4cc is stuck unclean for 1560.824332, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [18,10]
< snip>
pg 3.188 is stuck degraded for 1207.118130, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [14,17]
pg 3.768 is stuck degraded for 1123.722910, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [11,18]
pg 3.77c is stuck degraded for 1211.981606, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [9,2]
pg 3.7d1 is stuck degraded for 1074.422756, current state
active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, last acting [10,12]
pg 3.7d1 is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [10,12]
pg 3.77c is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [9,2]
pg 3.768 is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [11,18]
pg 3.709 is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [10,4]
<snip>
pg 3.5d8 is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [2,10]
pg 3.5dc is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [8,19]
pg 3.5f8 is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [2,21]
pg 3.624 is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill, acting [12,9]
2 ops are blocked > 1048.58 sec on osd.9
3 ops are blocked > 65.536 sec on osd.9
7 ops are blocked > 1048.58 sec on osd.8
1 ops are blocked > 524.288 sec on osd.8
1 ops are blocked > 131.072 sec on osd.8
<snip>
1 ops are blocked > 524.288 sec on osd.2
1 ops are blocked > 262.144 sec on osd.2
2 ops are blocked > 65.536 sec on osd.21
9 ops are blocked > 1048.58 sec on osd.5
9 ops are blocked > 524.288 sec on osd.5
71 ops are blocked > 131.072 sec on osd.5
19 ops are blocked > 65.536 sec on osd.5
35 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec on osd.5
14 osds have slow requests
recovery 4678/1097738 objects degraded (0.426%)
recovery 10364/1097738 objects misplaced (0.944%)
From: David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com<mailto:drakonst...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:33 AM
To: Matthew Stroud <mattstr...@overstock.com<mailto:mattstr...@overstock.com>>,
"ceph-users@lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>"
<ceph-users@lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Blocked requests
To be fair, other times I have to go in and tweak configuration settings and
timings to resolve chronic blocked requests.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM David Turner
<drakonst...@gmail.com<mailto:drakonst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
`ceph health detail` will give a little more information into the blocked
requests. Specifically which OSDs are the requests blocked on and how long
have they actually been blocked (as opposed to '> 32 sec'). I usually find a
pattern after watching that for a time and narrow things down to an OSD,
journal, etc. Some times I just need to restart a specific OSD and all is well.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:33 AM Matthew Stroud
<mattstr...@overstock.com<mailto:mattstr...@overstock.com>> wrote:
After updating from 10.2.7 to 10.2.9 I have a bunch of blocked requests for
‘currently waiting for missing object’. I have tried bouncing the osds and
rebooting the osd nodes, but that just moves the problems around. Previous to
this upgrade we had no issues. Any ideas of what to look at?
Thanks,
Matthew Stroud
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use and review of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message solely to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
sender immediately by telephone or return email. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use and review of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message solely to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
sender immediately by telephone or return email. Thank you.
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use and review of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message solely to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
sender immediately by telephone or return email. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
