Yes..case in point the legalising of medicinal marijuana use at a State
level, and the refusal of the Federal courts to recognise the state laws.
Although in other instances they HAVE allowed States to have their own take
on certain laws.
They claim that Marijuana has no medicinal uses, even though research has
shown otherwise, and anecdotal evidence by the people who are suffering and
using marijuana, also shows otherwise.
But I guess if people can grow a herb in their backyard, and get the
benefits of painkillers and psycho therapeutic drugs wihtout the terrible
stomach upsets, headaches and numerous other side effects...it would dent
the profit margins of quite a few large drug companies ....wouldn't it?
>;-)
-Gel
And the Wheel Of Morality Turns.
Turn Turn Turn
Wheel Of Morality..
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That's not what I'm arguing. I'm arguing that "any and all efforts" (not
even any and all existing efforts, but any and all efforts) to thwart drug
use would include stopping drug use even when it is medically justified.
Stopping legal use of illegal drugs is a valid effort to stop people from
using those drugs. You have mentioned several exceptions to laws. My point
is that "any and all" allows no room for exceptions and thus allows no room
for legitimate or understandable uses, which makes the statement not very
well thought out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
