won.  

to me that's the point of a conspiracy theory.  they are usually
bumbling events of a somewhat related order that if pieced together,
with a bit of hope, really sound almost believable.

its like this...

how many people think we landed on the moon, on that fateful day in,
what was it, 1969?

...tony

tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337

visit www.antiwrap.com to send long url emails to your friends!

-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous

-----Original Message-----
From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:39 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president

At 15:29 6/30/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>you forgot to mention that the terms of Cheney's retirement mean that
>he is still getting payments from Halliburton as we speak. It simply
>stretches my credulity to consider the proposition that he does not
>have a vested interest in Halliburton profits.
>
>But to me the over-riding issue is the Patriot Act. Re-electing Bush
>would be like saying hey, we really didn't like the Bill of Rights
>anyway.
>
>Dana

Perhaps I'm not in the light about this.  I'm asking that someone clue
me
in.  But as far as I know, the money Cheney is getting is deferred
compensation for work already provided before he was VP.  He does have
about half of million stock options in HAL but considering the type of
options that CEOs get they were most likely were already deep in the
money.

This does constitute a financial relationship, but I fail to see how
Cheney
really benefits if HAL makes more money.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to