hey, perhaps some respected journalist could have a look and decide it
really is on the up and up. As it is, there is not enough information.
You can say that there is not enough information therefore there is no
evidence, or you can take note that the lack of information is due to
the administration's hysterical refusal to make it available and say
gee, this looks pretty bad.
Dana
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:17:15 -0400, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes there was too much possibility of corrpution the way it was set
> up. If the contracts had been put out to bid and the KBR-H offer may
> have been a low bidder, the fact that it was a no-bid contract does
> raise a lot of suspicions. I think in this case Cheney should have
> been like Caesar's wife in this case - having not even the appearance
> of impropriety.
>
> larry
>
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:22:59 -0400, Monique Boea
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So the problem with the company is how he obtained the contract/business?________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
