On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:59:23 -0400, Monique Boea
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks! That was their exact argument.
>
> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
> of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
>
>
> But I had never gave it a thought until someone challenged the
> misinterpretation of it.
It's not really a misinterpretation though. Not unless you consider
Jefferson's own explanation to be a "misinterpretation".
-Kevin
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: Speaking of church and state Nick McClure
- Re: Speaking of church and state Kevin Graeme
- RE: Speaking of church and state Nick McClure
- Re: Speaking of church and state Larry C. Lyons
- RE: Speaking of church and state Nick McClure
- RE: Speaking of church and state Tony Weeg
- RE: Speaking of church and state Monique Boea
- RE: Speaking of church and state Monique Boea
- RE: Speaking of church and state Marwan Saidi
- RE: Speaking of church and state Monique Boea
- RE: Speaking of church and state Kevin Graeme
- RE: Speaking of church and state Monique Boea
- RE: Speaking of church and state Marwan Saidi
- RE: Speaking of church and state Monique Boea
- Re: Speaking of church and state Larry C. Lyons
- RE: Speaking of church and state Monique Boea
- RE: Speaking of church and state Nick McClure
- RE: Speaking of church and state Monique Boea
- RE: Speaking of church and state Nick McClure
- Re: Speaking of church and state Kevin Graeme
- RE: Speaking of church and state loathe