fame) and has been caught more than a few times not only getting the
story wrong, but fabricating elements of some of those stories, I put
no credulance in the paper.
The story on Roy Moore in the TFP was incorrect in a number of
different ways, first is that he substantially violated the law and
the constitution, and was quite unrepentant. The article in question
stated that it was persecution by the ACLU. Hello! Excuse Me but the
issue was his violating the constitution.
As for reputable papers, Times of London, Manchester Guardian, the
Washington Post, San Francisco Examiner are good examples as is the
Ottawa Citizen, as for radio, the CBC, BBC and NPR are good, as is
CSPAN. I don't watch cable or broadcast media.
larry
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:59:30 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > dug a bit more on the paper its a right wing screed
> > paper.
> Yes, Dana mentioned that last week.
>
> > Cover story
> > was on how Judge Roy Moore was persecuted by the
> > ACLU etc.
> What's wrong with that?
>
> > When I did
> > a google search, the second item to show up was a
> > report on a libel
> > suit againt the paper.
> Don't most papers have libel suits against them?
>
> > As always, consider the source. This one appears not
> > to be worth the
> > paper its printed on. Less credibility than the
> > Washington Times.
> LOL. What paper do you find reliable? NY Times?
> Washington Post?
>
> -sm
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
